Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
And so with socialism.
Coming out of capitalism will be a damaged people, but the fact that they have opted for socialism and understood it will imply a sense of responsibility, which at first will mean some sacrifice.
A society of abundance can be built, but that goes hand in hand with responsibility and abstaining from harm.
‘An irresponsible society would never establish socialism. The irresponsible thrive already’.
So Socialism is impossible.
If you buy into the selfish human nature myth.
Yes, socialism will never be made by people who don’t care about the planet and the welfare of other beings. It will be made by more people who do care becoming aware that capitalism is the problem.
The “don’t give a damn” crowd are those who mock the idea of socialism; who laugh at “do-gooders.” A socialist says better a do-gooder than a do-badder.
Those who commit harm now would be stopped, i e. the expropriation of the capitalist class in the first place. Socialism’s first priority, after getting food, clothing and shelter to those without them, would be to reverse what can be reversed of the damage capitalism has done; not a free-for-all licence for those wanting to continue the damage.
It strikes me that a conscious socialist population would be prepared to sacrifice production that is harmful to the natural environment, toxic to it, cruel and harmful to other species, and not necessary for humans to live. People who “don’t give a damn” about these things where their pleasures are concerned would, I hope, be publicly shamed. Socialism would, I hope, be a responsible and compassionate society first and foremost, and not a free-for-all for irresponsible hedonists and destructive people.
https://tass.com/politics/2146743
West planning preëmptive strikes – Russia.
Anything that reverses the march to war with Russia will be a relief.
But, if “leaders” are pushed by the capitalist system, if the AfD were elected, wouldn’t they have to continue to blow the war trumpet, since German capitalism is demanding it?
And if German capitalism is not what’s driving Merz & Co. to war, then what’s the logic? What are we seeing?
The Ukraine war is clearly not coming to a close, in spite of the views of many here that it is more or less over. NATO and the EU are not prepared to yield.
” Ukraine’s full accession to the European Union will trigger Article 42(7) TEU, the bloc’s binding mutual defense clause, which requires all EU member states to provide “aid and assistance by all the means in their power” if a member becomes the victim of armed aggression.”
So, it’ll be war with Russia!
https://tass.com/politics/2144597
Well, the US is not going to agree to that!
Google: ” French state centralization was spearheaded by Cardinal Richelieu and Cardinal Mazarin because their roles as unelected Chief Ministers granted them the supreme executive authority, ruthless neutrality, and institutional independence necessary to crush entrenched feudal privileges and consolidate royal absolutism.As clergymen, the Cardinals answered ultimately to the Crown and the Pope, allowing them to bypass traditional noble factions and navigate existential crises without fearing dynastic ruin or partisan backlash. Their historical centralization project was driven by a few key factors:Weakening the Feudal Aristocracy: Local nobles controlled regional territories and possessed their own private armies. The Cardinals stripped them of this military power, demolished fortified castles not needed for border defense, and replaced localized noble control with institutional administrators (the intendants) who reported directly to the Crown.Neutralizing Protestant Political Autonomy: To unify the state, Cardinal Richelieu curtailed the military and political privileges granted to the Huguenots (such as the heavily fortified city of La Rochelle), subordinating all factions to the absolute rule of the state.Fiscal and Military Survival: Frequent conflicts, particularly against the Austro-Spanish Habsburg dynasty, demanded massive state revenues. Centralization allowed the Crown to bypass obstructionist regional parliaments and efficiently levy taxes (like the taille) to sustain a modernized military and compete on the European stage.Building a Bureaucracy: They established a loyal administrative class (the noblesse de robe) that managed the state apparatus based on merit and loyalty rather than inherited noble bloodlines.**Preserving the Minority: ** Following Richelieu’s groundwork, Cardinal Mazarin successfully navigated the volatile regency of Anne of Austria and the young Louis XIV. He steered the monarchy through the aristocratic rebellions of the Fronde, securing the absolute system that the Sun King would later inherit and define.”
