ZJW

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 295 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Anti-Zionism is not anti-semitic #200215
    ZJW
    Participant

    Mondoweiss: ‘German censorship campaign targets scholar over BDS and applies “antisemitism” charge’:

     

     

    in reply to: Coronavirus #199280
    ZJW
    Participant

    Looking for ‘anarchic capitalists’? Well here for example: http://ronpaulinstitute.org .

     

    Covid-skeptical, broadly along similar lines to what can be seen at https://swprs.org/contact (section ‘Articles on Covid-19’), or at  https://off-guardian.org .

    in reply to: Coronavirus #198928
    ZJW
    Participant

    ALB: What left-communist discussion forum is that?

    in reply to: Coronavirus #198053
    ZJW
    Participant

    Michael Roberts: ‘Lives or livelihoods?’:

    in reply to: Coronavirus #197977
    ZJW
    Participant
    in reply to: Socialist Standard No. 1388 April #197892
    ZJW
    Participant
    <Socialism, Communism, Association—A rose by another name> contains:
       
       
    ‘[…] he imagines ‘an association of free men (<i>sic</i>), working  […]’
       
       
    What Marx wrote was ‘Verein freier Menschen’– association of free persons, *not* ‘Verein freier Männer’ – association of free men. (The German differentiation between ‘Mensch’ and ‘Mann’ is found throughout Germanic languages other than English.)
       
       
           
    Old-fashioned translations into English may use ‘of men’, but that is no reason to go on quoting it, then adding ‘[sic]’.
       
       
    Perhaps, with the agreement of the writer, ‘men’ can be corrected to ‘persons’ (or ‘individuals’?) in the internet edition of SS?
       
       
    Otherwise, a very fine article. of course.
    in reply to: Wolff, co-ops and socialism #194949
    ZJW
    Participant

    Explain the difference between co-ops and ‘communes’. ( Is the idea that the communes are food-producing and can be (relatively) autarkic?? )

    in reply to: Being logged out #193783
    ZJW
    Participant

    I have this same question.

    in reply to: The "new" Palestinian peace deal #193273
    ZJW
    Participant
    Maybe nothing very new here, but …
       
       
    map:
       
       
     Middle East Eye: ‘REVEALED: Trump’s ‘deal of the century’ map for a future Palestine, Israel’:
        
           
    Connection with IHRA:    
       
       
    And Counter Currents: ‘Zionism’s mass psychosis is not Israel’s private affair’:
       
           
    excerpt:
       
       
    ‘IHRA balances a dizzying mix of logic schisms. The Israeli state is the self-determination of Jews as Jews, but it is antisemitic to say that Jews favor Israel over their own nation, and it is also antisemitic to call Israel’s ethnic nationalism a racist endeavor; but then it is antisemitic to deny Israel as an ethnic nationalist state, yet it is also antisemitic to note any comparison between Israel and Nazism, no matter what Israel may ever do. Israeli citizenship offers further immunity under IHRA, but then it is antisemitic to hold Jews as a people responsible for what the Israeli state does — well, except for Zionism, which explicitly makes Jews the doers of what the Israeli state does — but then it is antisemitic to point this out.’
    in reply to: Anti-Trump Protests #191880
    ZJW
    Participant

    I don’t remember a US presidential election in which the ‘anarchist’ Chomsky did not call for voting for whichever would-be lesser-of-the-two-evils Democrat was running.

    in reply to: 'Oops' links #191810
    ZJW
    Participant

    Ok. Thanks all the same, though.

    in reply to: Anti-Trump Protests #191718
    ZJW
    Participant

    Kliman is on his same old rails, not off them. In 2016 he supported voting for Clinton.


    The following quote from the CWO (  https://bit.ly/37jcIBT  ) on October 2016:


    ‘All of which demonstrates that a sound analysis of the failings of capitalism is not enough if not accompanied by a defence of revolutionary politics and the recognition that communism is not just a nice version of capitalism but an entirely new mode of production in which the law of value has been abolished […] and society is moneyless. Roberts is not the first economist who has done useful work in defending the Marxist critique of capitalism yet does not link this to a revolutionary political programme. Even today Andrew Kliman has a similar critique of the the system to Roberts and ourselves (using a slightly different calculation) but as a member of the Marxist-Humanist Initiative he is supporting a “lesser evil” vote for Clinton in the US election. The temptation to be drawn onto the agenda set by the bourgeoisie is too great, even for those who should be theoretically armed to oppose it. ‘

    in reply to: SPGB crisis-theory #191717
    ZJW
    Participant

    I hope what I just posted is readable. The spaces I put between paragraphs all vanished. I see no editing function to make use of. (Unlike on the old forum, I think.)

    in reply to: Election Activity #191714
    ZJW
    Participant

    ‘ Is this something we should insist on being included in?’

     

    Yes!

     

    By the way, the Northite Trots (WSWS/’Socialist Equality Party’) are standing candidates:

     

    https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/11/18/cand-n18.html

    in reply to: “Superexploitation” #191686
    ZJW
    Participant

    And there is this as well, I know.

     

    ‘THE ANTI-IMPERIALIST DELUSION’:

     

    The anti-imperialist delusion

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 295 total)