Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Thomas_More
ParticipantNew school training:
How long before this is imposed in the UK?
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
ParticipantThis is the guy I believed (and I think you did too) when he was swearing officially that the idea of invading Ukraine was a ridiculous piece of western propaganda, right up to the day!
So who do we believe, Lavrov or Volodin?
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
Participanthttps://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2024/0919/putin-ukraine-war-russia-nuclear-war-ww3
” One of Russia’s top security experts, Alexei Arbatov, told the daily Nezavisimaya Gazeta this week that the drift of events is very dangerous because of the widespread belief in the West that Russia would never use nuclear arms.
“This is a very serious misconception: at some point, nuclear weapons will be used, despite the risk of escalation and general catastrophe,” he said.”
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
ParticipantThey all seem abysmally ignorant of how any use of these weapons, even just by one side (which it wouldn’t be) would result in a nuclear winter and mass starvation. They are actually toying with the idea of using them or “dealing with” an attack; and that is what’s frightening. They ARE stupid enough!
Thomas_More
ParticipantPoints taken. But can Putin afford to keep demolishing his credibility as a head of state by going out of his way to issue extreme and sensational bluffs?
Thomas_More
ParticipantWhen all this began with the abandonment of the Russia-EU pipeline, it was Germany and the EU reluctant in supporting the US/UK anti-Russia stance, but now it’s the EU urging permission for missiles to hit Russia regardless of Putin’s warning, and following the UK, which has left the EU!
Why has the EU become again more gung ho for war than even the US?-
This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
ParticipantThomas_More
ParticipantCan Starmer go ahead with the missile permission without US approval, embroiling NATO in war with Russia?
Thomas_More
ParticipantPeople here will continue to support UK policy.
Thomas_More
ParticipantStarmer urged to let missiles be used on Russia without waiting for US approval.
Thomas_More
ParticipantThe Churchill complex. All British PMs want to play Churchill, “directing” a war down in a govt bunker amid the accolades of flag-waving morons.
Thomas_More
ParticipantAt least at the UN more states will be involved, and I don’t see them allowing it. Britain isn’t popular in Europe as it is, and the US Democrats won’t want another major war putting off voters this side of the election. Am I right?
Thomas_More
ParticipantBut it’s up to the US, and the UK is doing all it can to get bombing permission.
France doesn’t count here, since it’ll be precipitated by Britain.Thomas_More
ParticipantPutin might not want war with NATO, but maybe NATO wants war with Russia. The way they are all massed on the borders …
Thomas_More
ParticipantI think number 3 on your list is the strongest motive.
No one ever questions the arms before butter factor, but they do complain about MPs vacations etc.
Workers at arms factories will support Starmer, because it will keep them in work.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 6 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts
