Thomas_More

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 2,379 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Tensions #256998
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Bernie Sanders supporting Ukraine:

    My comment is there.

    in reply to: The Starmer Labour government #256997
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    This, from a Trotskyist site.

    https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/04/18/zhcj-a18.html

    Starmer declared for nuclear war.

    in reply to: The Starmer Labour government #256996
    Thomas_More
    Participant
    in reply to: Leonard Peltier #256995
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Thanks. I shall forward this link to my friend in America.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #256993
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Those who shout against “appeasement” are warmongers. Socialists must support peace at all times, and must never give support to any war, not wars of “liberation” nor wars of conquest. Both result in death and misery for workers, who should always reject war.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #256992
    Thomas_More
    Participant
    in reply to: The Starmer Labour government #256991
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Britain and the Biden US, the Baltics and EU NATO states.

    ‘Let’s just fight’: How Britain prefers war over peace in Ukraine

    Putin is equally vile. Remember that Kiev, supplied by the West, had been bombarding the Donbas since 2014. And the NATO states said the war must continue to “the last Ukrainian.”

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #256986
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    I seem to remember Zelensky being originally voted in on a restore-relations-with-Russia ticket.

    in reply to: The Starmer Labour government #256984
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Not me. It’s a hard on to see the slaughter coming to an end and the warmongers defeated … For now.

    in reply to: Boxing and moral judgments #256978
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    ” I actually don’t think the ‘base-superstructure’ analogy is that useful, and I think it should be dropped. But that’s something for another day and another thread.”

    Strongly disagree. People wallow in the superstructure and take aspects of it as the base. For instance, watching the news and gloomily saying “It’s human nature.” They need to be made aware that the horrors they are witnessing are the products of the capitalist economic base, and that that is what produces the rest.

    in reply to: Boxing and moral judgments #256977
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    ” Would one not be closer to the truth in saying that anarchy is the struggle, in human society, against the disharmonies of Nature?””

    No. Human society has so far been the most disharmonious society of all.

    in reply to: Boxing and moral judgments #256972
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    I agree, DJP, that we should use aspects of the social superstructure to show people the socio-economic base, which is the capitalist mode of production.

    As to “nature”, whatever humans do is natural, including bringing about societies with their cultures. It is something humans do, and is therefore natural. It is FIXED human nature that we object to as a fallacy, because behaviours and ideas are produced by specific social environments which are constantly in flux. Hence there is no fixed human nature, beyond eating, requiring shelter, and seeking to reproduce.

    in reply to: Boxing and moral judgments #256966
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    ” I think these kinds of pieces are great.”

    Me too.

    • This reply was modified 11 months, 4 weeks ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: Boxing and moral judgments #256961
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Seen it. I don’t see anything wrong with it. It shows that people help each other without being paid, and that co-operation is also natural, and socialism therefore possible.

    • This reply was modified 11 months, 4 weeks ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: Boxing and moral judgments #256959
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    How can we say which window of the social superstructure will be someone’s entry into socialist awareness?
    All aspects of the superstructure (the culture we inhabit) are fair game for discussion. We cannot restrict ourselves to explaining and talking about the socio-economic base. People live within the superstructure of capitalism, their daily lives being part of it. As long as we avoid falling into reformism and single issues, all subjects can be talked about.

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 2,379 total)