Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Wez, it wasn’t “lefty liberal types” I was thinking of, but the “hard left”, who call themselves Marxists. Of course, labourism has also distorted the word ‘socialism’ to mean nationalisation, but the hard left are worse than that by supporting red fascist totalitarianism.
Mao’s most prominent Torquemada was Kang Sheng. There were many answerable to him, and he was answerable to Mao, who, like Hitler and Stalin, loved to play his underlings against each other.
Mao despised his own origins, the peasants, and he despised the workers. He feared anyone educated.
We in the west were never told of the misery the CPC inflicted right from the beginning of Mao’s ascendancy, back in the 1930s and 40s in Yenan, and through the 1950s – and all before the so-called Cultural Revolution of the 60s, which most of us assume was the start. The population was not passive, in spite of Mao’s propaganda machine, which insisted that everyone smile all the time, even while starving to death. There were open rebellions and calls for Mao’s arrest.
Yes, TS supports the Kims, Stalin, Mao, Mugabe, Gaddafi, and logically he must also support Pol Pot.
Yes, Robbo. TS identifies with states, not with people!
“This will spell the end of the world. If it happens better quit your job and spend all your money quicksmart. Neither will be of use any longer.”
And this shows he even relishes the thought!
And following his nationalist ‘logic’, we should all be gung-ho for “our” flags and govts too! Otherwise, we’re “cowards.”
Wez, far from being sympathetic to us, it’s the Left who are responsible for damaging the word SOCIALISM so much that it’s well-nigh unusable.
Think how easier life would be if we didn’t always have to begin with saying what we are NOT, and could just say straight-off what we ARE. But as soon as “Socialism” is mentioned, we’re fighting a rearguard action.TS obviously enjoys keeping company with us. Maybe he thinks he is getting our backs up, rattling our cage, etc. Quite the opposite. He keeps me entertained.
Let’s hope he learns something – which he won’t of course admit to – from members’ contributions here.
TS’s stance is similar to that of the conspiracy theorists, who discard everything someone says because of one thing they don’t like.
They too are ideology-followers, not analytical thinkers.
One, a flat-earther, was enthusing to me that there are THOUSANDS of flat-earthers, “proving” in itself that the Earth is flat! 😀
