steve colborn

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 880 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Is this evidence of collusion aka the swp? #93596
    steve colborn
    Participant

    As I am the only remaining member of the, North East 3, not suspended from this site, I ask, what does Admin think he is doing? Steve. PS I have broken "no rules", I am merely asking "a" question! Remember, I have broken "no" forum rules!

    in reply to: Is this evidence of collusion aka the swp? #93595
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Vin and the "other Steve" are continuing no grudge! merely seeking fairness and closure. Myself being "the other Steve", would moreover, endorse this. Steve, Colborn not Coleman.

    in reply to: Is this evidence of collusion aka the swp? #93594
    steve colborn
    Participant

    This is totally unacceptable, whichever way one wishes to slice it, or, SPIN it. Steve.

    in reply to: Future elections #92660
    steve colborn
    Participant

    I am heartened to read that Party members do not hold grudges against those who have the individualism in them, to voice contrary opinions. It is heartwarming to know that 32 years of fighting for Socialism in The Socialist Party have, in some small way, been appreciated. I will read the comradely comments again, when Capitalism depresses me. It is nice to know that the brotherly, comradely, friendly union of Socialists is alive and kicking "now", even before Socialism has been established.PS dont for an instant "dare" to suggest that I would traduce my Party in the forthcoming election. It is still my Party, in it, or outside of it. I did not spend the whole of my adult life to throw it all away. Steve.

    in reply to: Future elections #92659
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Nice idea by the way Paddy, a bathroom suite, or just a bath! I could get some slogans on the side, site it outside Seahams main shopping centre as a publicity stunt and talk to people passing by about the case, while I sit in the water, in my birthday suit, scrubbing of, metaphorically speaking, al the shite of Capitalism I have been exposed to for decades.Thanks for the idea Paddy   ) Steve.

    in reply to: Future elections #92658
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Just been reading a few of the comments re my request for assistance, on the spintcom site and I am quite puzzled by some of the comments there.I'll deal with one only for now! I am not seeking political office at all. I am standing, so that a name, recognised and linked with Socialism, will once again be there at these elections, in the full knowledge and understanding of those who have heard me and read me over the years. As I have said, 32 years of the advocacy for Socialism, in Easington and moreover the larger NE area, has my name inextricably linked with the espousal of the same. As for saying, or doing, something that would bring the Party into disrepute, in the infinitesimally small chance of "being elected", I could not nor would not. Why on earth would I mar my opinions and reputation for advocating Socialism and promoting the Party, as I have done assiduously in all this time?It would make no logical sense.You may question why I have left the Party, we all have the right to our opinions. What you cannot do, is question my credentials as a Socialist, in or out of the Party. If anyone does so, they do not know the kind of person I am. Steve.

    in reply to: Margaret Thatcher 1925-2013 #92956
    steve colborn
    Participant

    The head of Radio1 Ben Cooper, informs us that he has been caught between a rock and a hard place in his decision not to play the full record of, Ding dong The wicked witch is dead on the chart show. He also paronisingly informs us that it is the job of the BBC to inform and "educate" the audience as to why a group of people within society, would have done that, (getting this song into the charts). I think people in Capitalist Britain would be quite well aware of why this protest has been made! It does not need a buffoon like him to explain it!Moreover his use of the phrase, a rock and a hard place, is an insult to the millions under Thatcher who were, in reality, placed in this position during Thatchers rule and the countless millions placed in exactly the "same position" decades after Thatchers political demise, by her political Herrs, of the current coalition government.Workers dont need an appointee of the establishment intelligentsia pointing out the obvious. Why not Mr Cooper, use this oppurtunity to try and justify spending over 10 Million quid on a "credit card" that we are continually told has been maxed out? Heres a thought, have the body on display and let her sycophantic supporters pay money to view the corpse. When they raise sufficient funds then, and only then, bury the parasite. We'll see how much the wealthy revere her, in the only currency she, and they, understand or accept. Steve.

    in reply to: Future elections #92647
    steve colborn
    Participant

    OK, I'll ask. If I send a manifesto and if it is up to standard, would the Party print it for me, I'll pay! Steve.

    in reply to: Future elections #92644
    steve colborn
    Participant

    You are quite correct Adam, I did in fact say I did not want any finacial support but, I would have appreciated  the Party offering to print a manifesto on my behalf, which I would have paid for, (the prices of local printers being exhorbitant) and if what I wanted printing did not live up to my and our, principles, the Party did not need to agree to print it!The offer was not forthcoming however but would have been appreciated, acknowledged and more than likely accepted , nonetheless.Steve.

    in reply to: Margaret Thatcher 1925-2013 #92911
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Miners in Easington Co-Durham are having a party to also coincides with the 20th anniversary of the closing of the colliery.Steve.

    in reply to: Margaret Thatcher 1925-2013 #92935
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Exactly Adam, the gay abandon with which she revelled in fucking workers up was, to put it mildly, obscene!By the way, I mourn her death, the horrible old bigotted fucker, should have lived until she was at least a hundred and been in mortal agony every single fucking day!As Adam said she enjoyed it to much. 

    in reply to: Moderation and website technical issues #90568
    steve colborn
    Participant

    You must keep dodging the meteors YMS. As I said, I watched events unfold and for much of the time a moderator was online. Once again, when I sent my PM's to the moderator, he was in fact "online" for a significant length of time! Not really quantum mechanics is it?Oh by the way, when the events which occured on the locked thread were happening, the mod was online wearing his "other hat" and actually took part in the so-called discussion.If any part of that is to difficult to understand, I will do a pencil and crayon drawing.

    in reply to: Future elections #92638
    steve colborn
    Participant

    I thought I had put something on, "Socialist society not Capitalism". It was an oversight on my part, caused by the fact that I was not feeling well that morning. As you rightly say, it will be a straight fight, with the caveat that it will be one Socialist against two Labourites and as I have seen before this is not always good! But my Socialist ideas or well known, as is my stance, "you dont understand and agree, then vote for someone else".Steve.

    in reply to: Clarification of forum rules #93554
    steve colborn
    Participant

    DJP, the comment claiming OGW was a liar, was on the now, locked thread. That this comment has now been expunged is to be applauded, however, the comment was not removed immediately it was made indeed, there were a significant number of posts appearing between its appearance and the thread lockdown.With your other "hat on", you will know that this locked thread was the one containing the "liar comment" and that I am correct about the number of intervening posts.

    in reply to: Moderation and website technical issues #90566
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Logically you say! well if you want logic, is it logical that so many posts were shown between the time of the incident and thread lockdown and still to try and claim it had "anything at all" to do with "lockdown"? I would suggest it is tenuous at best. I do indeed know what rain is, as I also know when someones pissing down my back.

Viewing 15 posts - 616 through 630 (of 880 total)