steve colborn

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 1,276 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119385
    steve colborn
    Participant

    The Chair stated that the motion to move next business be put to a vote. Sorry comrades but I dont see a vote, or figures for the same, never mind the Form F's not being next on the Agenda.I'm sure if you look, the Chair said Forms A and F would come under any other business.

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119383
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Vin Linda you are both out of order.

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119372
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Yes, by certain people of a surety. All through this meeting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119369
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Vin, you are procedurally incorrect. SP can cast his vote regarding the Form F's under any other business as I have ruled as Chair.Item4 was Forms A F, that is past.As for me being a pedant, I'll say this, asking to "move on" is nowhere the same as moving "next business", as you are well aware.As for "Really? I have said 'can we move' on at least half dozen time. If you don't believe, find the evidence youself", no Vin, I think I'll take a leaf from "your playlist", you, can provide the evidence, "yourself".Finally, I've attempted to Chair this meeting in the fairest way I can, to be met with obfuscation and waffle. Well obfuscate away, my last act as Chair is to say!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119364
    steve colborn
    Participant

    The Form's F will now be dealt with under Any Other Business SP.

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119362
    steve colborn
    Participant

    steve colborn wrote: Tim has moved "next business", as he is entitled to do. Do we have a seconder?  As I did earlier and no seconder was requestedCan you tell me which number post you moved Next Business Vin. Just so I can minute my mistake.

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119358
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Moved and seconded TK-VM. Call for a vote.

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119357
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Tim has moved "next business", as he is entitled to do. Do we have a seconder?

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119355
    steve colborn
    Participant

    You were not speaking about me, you were speaking about SP and for the final time it was "not", I repeat "not" a private EMail. Moreover, I don't know damn well it was Banter,thats your summation of it.Publish the E Mail evidence you have, where I call members of the Party. If those I dislike, aren't aware of the fact by now, they are fairly thick. So publish them. Remind them how much certain people in the Party boil my piss, I don't care. Dont, for one instant, however, think yourself and Linda are amongst those I dislike you aren't and I do not.I do what I always do/will do, try to be fair and equitable, if that sometimes causes some to fall out with me!!! so be it.

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119349
    steve colborn
    Participant

    There is also a trust issue. When a friend and comrade of 40 years publishes a private email I sent to him.  By the way Mr Colborn, I have some emails from you about other members that would be removed by the MOD but dont worry I would go that low as to breach your  confidence. Vin I will state two last things;1/I restate the E Mail in question was not a Private E Mail. If ithad been it would not have been passed on. Read it again, see for yourself.2/I am sure there are many E Mails from me about other members. On none of them, I am quite sure, have I stated they are "Private". Just as is the case about "the" E Mail.By the way, I abstain on the Form F.SP. is quite correct, by the way. Standing Orders have been suspended and there is a matter on the table for discussion. Forms A and F were Item 4 on the Agenda. We have moved on since then.Please bring the Form F up, under any other Business.

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119342
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Eileen here, I vote to abstain.

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119341
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Vin has asked me to place his Form F before the Branch, therefore here it is; Can members of NERB vote on whether or not to accept Vin maratty's form F

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119336
    steve colborn
    Participant

    That was not, I repeat not, a Private E Mail. You said ""You know him better than I do but if he doesnt back off from Linda……..My instinct will kick in If she want to close her account, she will close it" Your intention, implicit in the E Mail, was that I inform SP to backoff, otherwise why use that choice of words. I informed him of the E Mail on the night in question. I saw it, I passed on your words to SP, therefore he saw it, it was then passed on again. If I had been asked to keep the words of the E Mailto myself, I would have done so, I'm not a "blabbermouth", but I was not asked to do so. Besides what would have been the point of the E Mail, if not to pass on to SP?

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119330
    steve colborn
    Participant

    It seem sp and sc can make accusation freely at their will.  Time you withdrew them? There it is again! Scroll back up, its easy, copy and paste any and all "accusations", thats easy as well, considering there are "none".Just copied and pasted this E.Mail, 9.40 on the 28th April ;"You know him better than I do but if he doesnt back off from Linda……..My instinct will kick in If she want to close her account, she will close it" That, as far as I'm concerned, is far from a bit of banter. 

    in reply to: Agenda for April Meeting #119324
    steve colborn
    Participant

    By the way, there is no agenda here but explanation and truth.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 1,276 total)