chelmsford

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 139 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Labour Party facing bankruptcy #244218
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Plenty of police would have been marshalling this demonstration. I suppose it would have been a bit awkward for you to approach a copper – one of these uncomradely social-catastrophes has lifted my iPhone, I demand you nick the lot of ’em!
    Ironic really. The Chinese police know how to deal with the light-fingered.
    There was a time when SPGBer’s attended demonstrations to let the demonstrators know they (the demonstrators) were wasting their time. Now the SPGB join in. Is there no party discipline?

    in reply to: The Climate Emergency #244014
    chelmsford
    Participant

    The future looks to be a wee bit foggy if that graph(?) is anything to go by.’Doomster’.The name sort of gives it away. What is the difference between this joker and those fellows in days of yore who would tramp the streets carrying placards bearing the legend ‘Prepare To Meet Thy Doom’?
    They are online.
    Relax.There is no climate emergency.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #243895
    chelmsford
    Participant

    If capitalism is the cause of war, why is it most south american capitalist nations manage to get along without resorting to arms every now and then? Most african armies are either clobbering the locals, fighting rebels or overthrowing the current regime. Wars between african states are rare. It is a minority of capitalist states who go to war, and it is usually the same ones.
    Propertarians would argue that the truly capitalist way to capture a market is to provide a cheaper, better commodity. Gunboats are used by gangsters and racketeers.
    You can scrutinise Marx’s economic writings until your eyes ache and you wont find the cause of war in them.
    There is no difficulty in imaging capitalism without wars. War is not needed for capitalism to continue and progress.

    chelmsford
    Participant

    Isn’t the burden of proof on the SPGB? If what you are doing is sound, why such lamentable results?

    chelmsford
    Participant

    Hardly a mere quandary, more of a dirty great hole in socialist theory.

    in reply to: Film #243491
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Two-Way Stretch.
    Scene: The prison rock quarry.
    Convict: Please Sir, I’ve broken me ‘ammer.
    Chief Warder Kraut (Lionel Jeffries): Leanin’ on it I suppose.
    Convict: No, si-
    Kraut: Silence! when you’re talkin’ to me!

    Best film ever.

    in reply to: Cost of living crisis #243429
    chelmsford
    Participant

    The letter in the latest Weekly Worker from Arthur Bough demolishes (not for the first time) Michael Robert’s argument.
    The SPGB line on inflation is vindicated (by a CPGBer).
    Never doubted it for a moment.

    in reply to: Cost of living crisis #243385
    chelmsford
    Participant

    It is Engels who comments on the ideas of Ricardo and Mill. Beginning of chapter 34 and page 680 of the Pengiun addition.
    What they say is very much like the SPGB understanding of inflation, and Engels rubbishes it.
    The SPGB argument is woefully wrong, wrong, wrong!

    in reply to: Cost of living crisis #243363
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Merely going on Marx’s comments in volume three on the monetary theories of both men. Mill, it appears, was deeply suspicious of the pound note. Always rather liked them myself.
    Roberts seems to confuse a (temporary?) rise in prices due to ‘the restriction of supply, both in production and transportation’, something that goes on all the time in capitalism, (and which governments have little or no control over) with an annual rise in the general price level due to a government depreciating the currency. Two different things.
    The SPGB argument is spot on.

    in reply to: Cost of living crisis #243346
    chelmsford
    Participant

    The article on inflation by Michael Roberts in the latest Weekly Worker makes no mention of an excess issue of notes and coins as the explanation for inflation. Paul Mattick was of the same opinion.
    The SPGB account looks like that put forward by Ricardo and JS Mill, both dismissed by Marx.

    in reply to: What have the royals done for us? #243103
    chelmsford
    Participant

    I read a book once. Green it was.

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243061
    chelmsford
    Participant

    For those of you living in London, there are a number of rain-dances available on Youtube.

    in reply to: Our chance to forswear allegiance #243017
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Rod Hull dies in an unexplained accident breaking his crown after falling off a ladder while fiddling with his TV aerial. About the same time this ‘Camilla Parker-Bowles’ person mysteriously turns up. No one ever these two people in the same room at the same time.
    My old peepers will be glued to the telly this Saturday. I don’t want to miss seeing Emu wrestling with the monkey on the stick.

    in reply to: Wolff, co-ops and socialism #242911
    chelmsford
    Participant

    Steele was responsible for that frenzied toe-tapper ‘Little White Bull’ unleashed onto an unsuspecting public in 1957. It topped the charts at number 6. He abandoned Socialism and embraced Propertarianism after reading Ludwig Von Mises between ‘takes’ during the filming of the 1967 Hollywood blockbuster ‘Arthur Sixpence’.

    in reply to: The Dark Future of the USA #242825
    chelmsford
    Participant

    On my last visit to the colonies I had the tremendous pleasure of meeting Sasquatch (to whom, incidentally, I am distantly related on my mother’s side). He told me a simply marvelous story about Harold Acton and Gertude Stein. Though I now forget the exact details. I urged him to stand for President. He bummed a ten dollar bill off me and said he would think about it.

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 139 total)