ALB
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
”The Zionist state is solely responsible for the ongoing escalation due to its continuous violations of the rights of the Palestinian people, including the recent repeated incursions into the al-Aqsa Mosque under the protection of the Israeli police.”
What has happened? Lizzie has ceased to be a sniping cynic and expressed a political view of her own. Sounds as if you have just got back from demonstrating outside the Israeli embassy.
I don’t think the some perceived violation of a Muslim holy building can justify the massacre of young men and women at a music festival. If it does, that doesn’t say much for Islam. But I wouldn’t have thought that most Muslims would agree it does.
I wouldn’t say it’s “very good”. It’s on the right lines but I expect they are in favour of an international civil war to try to establish socialism. Which would of course see the same massacres and destruction as we are seeing now in Palestine.
An international civil war, can you imagine it. The break-up of Yugoslavia on a world scale.
”There’s a resounding noise, from the PM, Sunak, Biden, that ‘Israel has a right to defend itself’ (and, in international law, it does, but proportionately”
There’s no chance of the response being proportionate. The Israeli state has rewritten the Book of Exodus to read “a hundred eyes for an eye” and consistently practised this revised commandment from their holy book.
I prefer the simpler theory that Harper is just stupid and just used the conspiracy theory, probably not realising that it was one, as part of the Tory party’s current pro-motorist rhetoric.
More on the conspiracy theory of 15 minute cities here;
Still, playing the pro-motorist card is not as bad as playing the anti-immigrant one.
If the SSP had stood in Vauxhall and got 0.9 percent that would be 13 votes (271 Rutherglen).
So they are in the same league too — or maybe even the sane league as at least they employ the language of socialism. Or more probably not as they are both reformist and petty nationalist.
Yesterday Putin gave a speech which the Russian authorities billed as important. In it he defended the Russian capitalist state’s war in terms of Realpolitik (rather his other nonsense about Ukrainians being lost Russians or defending the values of Orthodox Christianity). Basically, his argument was that the Russian state was threatened by Western expansion up to its borders.
In the course of the speech he mentioned something that is often overlooked — that at one time post-Soviet Russia considered joining NATO:
“I have said this publicly to both our allies and partners. There was a moment when I simply suggested: perhaps we should also join NATO? But no, NATO does not need a country like ours. No. I want to know, what else do they need? We thought we became part of the crowd, got a foot in the door. What else were we supposed to do? There was no more ideological confrontation.”
I don’t know if there was any realistic prospect of Russia joining NATO but, as Putin pointed out, why not as “there was no more ideological confrontation”? After all, Russia like the NATO countries was openly capitalist.
And it only cost £105 to print 2000 leaflets and nothing to distribute them.
Nobody has yet made the point that in the Rutherglen by-election in Scotland yesterday that the TUSC candidate got the same percentage of the vote which in number of votes was 178:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023_Rutherglen_and_Hamilton_West_by-election
And they campaigned for a whole raft of reforms. In any event, we are both in the sane league.
Yes, and don’t forget that NATO also waged a war against Serbia in 1999 which they did all the things that they denounce Russia for doing in Ukraine—bombing hospitals, civilian infrastructure and fleeing columns of refugees. There are still NATO troops in Kosovo.
“The NATO bombing killed about 1,000 members of the Yugoslav security forces in addition to between 489 and 528 civilians. It destroyed or damaged bridges, industrial plants, hospitals, schools, cultural monuments, private businesses as well as barracks and military installations. In the days after the Yugoslav army withdrew, over 164,000 Serbs and 24,000 Roma left Kosovo. Many of the remaining non-Albanian civilians (as well as Albanians perceived as collaborators) were victims of abuse which included beatings, abductions, and murders.“
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia
Then they just used their air power. Now, in the Ukrainian armed forces, they have boots on the ground and all they need do is supply the weapons.
A similar outcome can be expected if ever they NATO-armed Ukraine state succeeds in “recovering” the Donbass and Crimea. The destruction and damage of “bridges, industrial plants, hospitals, schools, cultural monuments, private businesses” is going on now as we speak. The ethnic cleansing and massacres would ensue in the event of “success”.
As you say, what hypocrites in their pro-war propaganda but of course par for the course in a world of competing capitalist states and blocs coming into conflict over economic resources and trade routes and seeking geopolitical dominance to achieve or protect these.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-67016375.amp
So another bank is in trouble. Metro Bank needs to raise more capital but, if banks can create money out of thin air, why don’t they just do it and their problem is solved?
Although the problem hasn’t been caused by depositors taking their money out — this seems, rather, to be a consequence — note the matter of fact way that financial journalists accept that depositors are important to banks. Here’s Patrick Hoskins, their financial editor, in today’s Times;
“All banks … are ultimately unstable entities, relying on the continuing confidence of their ordinary depositors to function. Metro is 81 per cent depositor funded and had £115.5 billion of outstanding deposits at June 30.”
Yes but it means that Mick McGahey’s joke doesn’t work so well any more. But I see that one of the candidates in the Rutherglen parliamentary by-election (where 10 signatories are still required) also held yesterday one of the candidate got only 6 votes. Maybe the punchline is that 4 members got expelled for not voting for their candidate.
It wouldn’t have taken long as there were only 1418 papers to count (there were 3 invalid votes, voting for more than one candidate).
I was at the count and it only took a couple of hours. Talked to the Tory candidate who thanked us for sending him a copy of the Socialist Standard with the articles on Adam Smith. We had hoped that he might be tempted into replying in writing.
The result is in line with what we get at local by-elections in the area.
Turn-out was 22 percent down from 27 percent at the full council elections last May.
Here’s the result announced just after midnight;
LAMBETH Vauxhall
SWAINE-JAMESON, Tom Simon (Labour Party) 595
ALDERECHI, Fareed (Liberal Democrats) 395
BOND, Jacqueline Rose (The Green Party) 256
ROTHERHAM, Lee Stuart (Conservative Party Candidate) 160
LAMBERT, Daniel Peter (The Socialist Party (GB)) 9Vauxhall (Lambeth) council by-election result:
LAB: 42.0% (-11.1)
LDEM: 27.9% (+16.8)
GRN: 18.1% (-2.1)
CON: 11.3% (-4.3)
SPGB: 0.6% (+0.6)Votes cast: 1,415
To complete what our opponents say, here’s the Tory candidate’s election statement. It is the Lee Rotherham, the die-hard Brexiteer and researcher for the Taxpayers Alliance.
Lee Rotherham: I’m standing for Lambeth Council to provide a functioning opposition to Labour
