Thomas_More

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,336 through 1,350 (of 2,362 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The Bible and the benefits system. #244870
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    ” ( although the roman did not use cross )”

    Are you sure? So Spartacus wasn’t crucified?

    I don’t believe that. To crucify comes from crux (cross).

    in reply to: The Dark Future of the USA #244869
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    An Egyptian I knew in Switzerland told me that when he went to renew his visa to the U.S., he was asked what political parties he belonged to. When he replied that he didn’t belong to any, he was told to list all the political parties he didn’t belong to!!!

    in reply to: The Bible and the benefits system. #244859
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Christopher Hill’s The English Bible is an excellent historical materialist history of the English Bible.

    in reply to: The Bible and the benefits system. #244857
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    I had the 1582 Rheims New Testament.

    in reply to: The Bible and the benefits system. #244854
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    M.R. James edited the non-canonical New Testament.

    in reply to: The Bible and the benefits system. #244853
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    The Jerusalem Bible is Catholic, isn’t it?

    in reply to: The Bible and the benefits system. #244847
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    The Adulterer’s Bible is famous for its misprint: “Thou shalt covet thy neighbour’s wife.”

    in reply to: The Bible and the benefits system. #244846
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Nothing comes up on that page and I get an “unsafe” message.

    in reply to: De Sade, Enlightenment thinker. #244838
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Sade antispeciste. (French).

    Sade antispéciste ?

    in reply to: Forum moderation #244836
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    What i’m saying is there must be socialists, or at least people coming close to socialism there, and globally, who have never heard of the WSM, but who, like us, reject leftism.
    It is arrogant indeed to think that we alone have come to our, or at least similar, conclusions, when discontent is ever more widespread.

    They might not even use the word socialism, because they equate the word with leftist, authoritarian, groups.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: No need for shoddy in socialism. #244832
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    “Human above everything.” I challenge that. I want fellow animals to live free, plentifully and satisfyingly for themselves too.
    But that’s for other threads, and my views are well known.
    If humans are to still be speciesist, then they will still not have grown up and recognised that they are in nature, not above it. And while still in thrall to the master principle, they’ll be unable to make socialism work.

    in reply to: No need for shoddy in socialism. #244829
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Some P.O.D. publishers must be taking the mick.

    Someone bought me (not cheap) a book listed as a work by Mark Twain billed as “Good quality book.”
    When it arrived, it was thinner than a brochure, was a few photocopies badly glued together (bad photocopies too: illustrations and text barely visible), no pagination, text disappearing off the pages, and every alternate leaf completely blank. And, on the flimsy cover glaring at me in large letters: GOOD QUALITY BOOK.

    This has to be the worst of the worst, and the damned thing cost £14.95, and the description was obviously mocking the buyer.

    P.O.Ds are now the first items which appear on book-buying sites. They are obviously considered good enough for the likes of us who don’t want E-books, almost as though to discourage us from print editions of books (but I won’t go that far because i’m not a conspiraloon).

    However, I now never buy a book unless i’m sure it’s a book and not a “book.”

    P.S. I have also seen some for sale online which have the wrong author pictured on the cover and the ‘blurb’ full of misspellings.

    And so I felt sick when told that a closing-down bookseller in this town was throwing piles of good hardback books in a rubbish skip for destruction.

    • This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by Thomas_More.
    • This reply was modified 2 years, 7 months ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: The Bible and the benefits system. #244824
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    The Bible is a book of contradictions, and each person or sect reads what it wants in it.

    in reply to: No need for shoddy in socialism. #244823
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Then those people can have the shoddy.

    in reply to: De Sade, Enlightenment thinker. #244818
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    https://www.centrepompidou.fr/en/ressources/oeuvre/c6bk9z

    The very gentle and compassionate artist and writer Maurice Heine was the man who pulled the Marquis de Sade out of obscurity to be read and studied in the 20th century.
    Heine was a friend of Gilbert Lely, from whom I have a postcard sent a few days before Lely’s decease.
    Lely was of Jewish family and hid in Provence near Sade’s former chateau of La Coste throughout the Vichy years and Nazi rule.
    Heine died of starvation in 1940 since he used all his rationing allowance to ensure his numerous cats were regularly fed.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,336 through 1,350 (of 2,362 total)