Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Thomas_More
ParticipantBiden: even a nuke within Ukraine will spark Armageddon.
Thomas_More
Participant” Washington doesn’t appear ready to take the gloves off entirely and allow Ukraine to target Russia’s airfields with long-range U.S. missiles quite yet — though it may withdraw restrictions on the U.K.’s Storm Shadows, which use U.S. technology.”
the British might be allowed to proceed without U.S. objection,”
(Politico)-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Thomas_More.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
ParticipantWill China restrain Putin on his threats?
Thomas_More
ParticipantBut Kyiv Starmer and Zealolensky are obviously wanting to goad Pootin beyond that point.
Thomas_More
ParticipantBut he has now said that that would be the case if Ukraine does, and that NATO would then be considered officially by him as in direct war with Russia. That’s not saying he will hit Ukraine alone with the missiles but NATO countries too.
And with Starmer pushing for it, Biden is likely to allow it, as long as the missiles are British and not American.Al Jazeera:
“..by describing such assaults on Russia as a “joint attack”, Putin has effectively laid the ground for Moscow to argue that it could target Ukraine’s nuclear-armed allies – the US, UK and France – directly, on their soil, if Kyiv attacks Russia in ways that the Kremlin concludes are a “critical threat” to the country’s sovereignty.”-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Thomas_More.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Thomas_More.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
Participant“Europe does not have a developed [early warning system],” he added. “In this sense they are more or less defenceless.” – Putin.
This is hinting at European countries being targeted by Russian nuclear missiles, not Ukraine.
Thomas_More
ParticipantI think Biden will authorise the use of missiles deep inside Russia. Everything is tending toward it.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
Participanthttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12470309/Putin-nuclear-weapon-Britain.html
First time on “combat duty.” Carries ten nuclear bombs.
Why put these on duty, if everything’s a bluff?
Thomas_More
ParticipantWhich raises the question of Putin’s motive in this militarization of civilian life, if he is not expecting total war.
Thomas_More
ParticipantNew school training:
How long before this is imposed in the UK?
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
ParticipantThis is the guy I believed (and I think you did too) when he was swearing officially that the idea of invading Ukraine was a ridiculous piece of western propaganda, right up to the day!
So who do we believe, Lavrov or Volodin?
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
Participanthttps://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2024/0919/putin-ukraine-war-russia-nuclear-war-ww3
” One of Russia’s top security experts, Alexei Arbatov, told the daily Nezavisimaya Gazeta this week that the drift of events is very dangerous because of the widespread belief in the West that Russia would never use nuclear arms.
“This is a very serious misconception: at some point, nuclear weapons will be used, despite the risk of escalation and general catastrophe,” he said.”
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
ParticipantThey all seem abysmally ignorant of how any use of these weapons, even just by one side (which it wouldn’t be) would result in a nuclear winter and mass starvation. They are actually toying with the idea of using them or “dealing with” an attack; and that is what’s frightening. They ARE stupid enough!
Thomas_More
ParticipantPoints taken. But can Putin afford to keep demolishing his credibility as a head of state by going out of his way to issue extreme and sensational bluffs?
Thomas_More
ParticipantWhen all this began with the abandonment of the Russia-EU pipeline, it was Germany and the EU reluctant in supporting the US/UK anti-Russia stance, but now it’s the EU urging permission for missiles to hit Russia regardless of Putin’s warning, and following the UK, which has left the EU!
Why has the EU become again more gung ho for war than even the US?-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
Thomas_More.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 5 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts
