Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Biden: even a nuke within Ukraine will spark Armageddon.
” Washington doesn’t appear ready to take the gloves off entirely and allow Ukraine to target Russia’s airfields with long-range U.S. missiles quite yet — though it may withdraw restrictions on the U.K.’s Storm Shadows, which use U.S. technology.”
the British might be allowed to proceed without U.S. objection,”
(Politico)But he has now said that that would be the case if Ukraine does, and that NATO would then be considered officially by him as in direct war with Russia. That’s not saying he will hit Ukraine alone with the missiles but NATO countries too.
And with Starmer pushing for it, Biden is likely to allow it, as long as the missiles are British and not American.Al Jazeera:
“..by describing such assaults on Russia as a “joint attack”, Putin has effectively laid the ground for Moscow to argue that it could target Ukraine’s nuclear-armed allies – the US, UK and France – directly, on their soil, if Kyiv attacks Russia in ways that the Kremlin concludes are a “critical threat” to the country’s sovereignty.”“Europe does not have a developed [early warning system],” he added. “In this sense they are more or less defenceless.” – Putin.
This is hinting at European countries being targeted by Russian nuclear missiles, not Ukraine.
I think Biden will authorise the use of missiles deep inside Russia. Everything is tending toward it.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12470309/Putin-nuclear-weapon-Britain.html
First time on “combat duty.” Carries ten nuclear bombs.
Why put these on duty, if everything’s a bluff?
Which raises the question of Putin’s motive in this militarization of civilian life, if he is not expecting total war.
New school training:
How long before this is imposed in the UK?
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2024/0919/putin-ukraine-war-russia-nuclear-war-ww3
” One of Russia’s top security experts, Alexei Arbatov, told the daily Nezavisimaya Gazeta this week that the drift of events is very dangerous because of the widespread belief in the West that Russia would never use nuclear arms.
“This is a very serious misconception: at some point, nuclear weapons will be used, despite the risk of escalation and general catastrophe,” he said.”
They all seem abysmally ignorant of how any use of these weapons, even just by one side (which it wouldn’t be) would result in a nuclear winter and mass starvation. They are actually toying with the idea of using them or “dealing with” an attack; and that is what’s frightening. They ARE stupid enough!
Points taken. But can Putin afford to keep demolishing his credibility as a head of state by going out of his way to issue extreme and sensational bluffs?
When all this began with the abandonment of the Russia-EU pipeline, it was Germany and the EU reluctant in supporting the US/UK anti-Russia stance, but now it’s the EU urging permission for missiles to hit Russia regardless of Putin’s warning, and following the UK, which has left the EU!
Why has the EU become again more gung ho for war than even the US?
