Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
How far do you think the planned militarisation and mobilisation will go? Compulsory “civil defence”/nuclear war drills? How should we respond?
I recently forwarded an anti-fur message, upon request, to “my” MP. He shot it down with an email saying that the only priority now is “national defence.” This will be the response to all social welfare projects too: must be shelved as “national defence” is more important!😡
How far are they going to push this hysteria over a war the US is sick of?
An example of the type of “incidents” that could provide an excuse for EU/UK pre-emption.
If discontent at social/welfare cuts spreads, the EU and UK could maybe use the russophobic hysteria they are fuelling to bring in martial law and maybe even stage an “incident” to provoke war for real, do you think?
https://tass.com/world/1923043
Macron summoning army chiefs.
According to the pamphlet, Pankhurst was for a time a real socialist, as her two pieces in the pamphlet demonstrate.
Everywhere, all across Europe and the US, the workers and the Leftists are opposing Trump over Ukraine and supporting the Democrats and Britain in opposing a Trump/Putin peace.
The Left is in no way class conscious. It is still in thrall to the slogan of “national liberation.”
” but that does not mean we should be in favor of peace.” ?
This is obviously a mistake in English.
Every time Ukraine gets missiles and fires them into Russia we know Russian missiles will follow into Ukraine. How can those moaning about cutting weapons to Ukraine, or anywhere, can bring peace? Ukraine will never be able to end the war that way, just prolong it.
It is surely known before Trump came on the scene that NATO expansion was the issue for Russia. It has nothing to do with Trump saying so. We already knew it.
“I perceive glee in Trump’s actions among some comrades. Not good.”
Anything that stops the war has got to be good, although we know Trump’s priorities are not ours.
