Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Thomas_More
ParticipantErdogan condemned the recent annexations I believe?
Thomas_More
ParticipantThere is the leader of the Bosnian Serbs ready to start a war again. He’s a Putin man.
Thomas_More
ParticipantThe Highlanders would never have thought of themselves as Scottish, nor as a nation, but as children of a clan. Like the Japanese used to.
And those who thought of themselves as “Scottish” hated and despised the Highlanders as “savages”, to be got rid of. The same way the American colonials looked at the natives. So, like all nationalism, Scottish nationalism is also garbage.-
This reply was modified 3 years, 3 months ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
ParticipantBut the Lowland Gaels would have been pushed north quite quickly I think, Alan, by the English (Saxon) and Norman settlers.
Robert the Bruce, the great Scottish hero, was in fact Robert de Bruys, a Norman.
Thomas_More
ParticipantI remember Alf Garnett trying to prove a racist point about blood by arguing you can’t give a Jew Catholic blood or vice versa.
Thomas_More
ParticipantCould be Britons (Welsh), since some British (Welsh) tribes occupied the north too.
I don’t know why U.K. nationals are called Britons by the media unless they are Welsh. The term British cannot be used politically until after 1707. Before then it was applied specifically and correctly to the Welsh and Cornish alone.
The Scots who came from the north of Ireland were the Gaelic speakers of the Highlands. Lowland “Scots” are not Scots, but descendants of Anglo-Normans, Saxons (“Sassenachs”) and Welsh (Britons).https://images.app.goo.gl/7DmniToqJPqXWvkM7
-
This reply was modified 3 years, 3 months ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
Participanthttps://images.app.goo.gl/jxaeD6ijAbBtjBNt7
This chap is ethnically Orthodox.
Thomas_More
Participant“Next they’ll be referring to the Protestants of Northern Ireland as “ethnic Britons”.”
You mean Welsh.
Thomas_More
ParticipantRe: Pol Pot, Mao, etc. The Taipings were similar in their lethality. Mixing a semi-Christian fanaticism with their peasant ardour and the cult-like hero-worship we see in Maoist sects, they executed homosexuals and other minorities and deified their leaders.
Thomas_More
ParticipantMovimiento, do the Trotskyists also espouse “national liberation.”
Thomas_More
ParticipantWell said, Alan. Chinese Leninists are full of “national liberation”, unless you are Formosan, Vietnamese, Tibetan, Uighur, etc. That’s why they supported Pol Pot (liberate people from life!) Idi Amin, and, finally Nixon and Thatcher.
I cannot recommend enough the superb book, A TRAGIC LIBERATION, whose author I will give here in a moment.Thomas_More
ParticipantWell said, Bijou. Could it be that TS is … a coward!?
Thomas_More
ParticipantLenin didn’t give a fig about his “national liberation” balderdash unless it suited him and the “Communist” Party.
He sent Trotsky to butcher the Ukrainian peasantry and the Makhnovists, even though it was Makhno who had crushed the Whites and had saved Moscow.
Lenin also sent his Red Army thugs to destroy the democratic Menshevik govt in Georgia and the Siberian Makhnovist soviets.Thomas_More
ParticipantSo, without necessity, he’s going to nuke us, the populations of the West?
-
This reply was modified 3 years, 3 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts
