Citizenoftheworld
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
At either side of the conflict ( Pakistan/China, India/USA ) workers should not sacrificed their own lives defending the interests of the capitalist class
Another conflict for resources and commercial routes:
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/05/09/fwji-m09.html
This is not a religious conflict as the capitalist press wants to present it to the world, it is just another conflict among capitalists and part of the struggle for world hegemony between the USA and China.
The cause of wars is capitalism and nationalism is a mental poison used by the rulers in order to divide the working class
Even more, School of Finance and Banking do not support that conspiracy theory. Metropolitan banking officers were encouraged to obtain new customers and new depositors all the time. There is a new financial scandal on cryptocurrency
Socialism must be a stateless society It was Lenin who separated socialism from communism. There’s not any relationship between government and democracy
And then, we would be able to talk about democracy and socialism What we know now is a distortion of both conception
It might become the British MAGA movement. In our time, the working class is becoming extremely reactionary and recalcitrant.
It looks like the European capitalist class has not learned from the past; instead of being destroyed by the German capitalist class as during WW2, it can be destroyed by the Russian capitalist class. It has been kicked out by the US capitalist class, too
The process of nationalization was started in England by the Manchesterists, and then it was copied by other nationalist classes, but the KMT was able to initiate a longer and wider process of nationalization because they had more economic control than the Maoists.
Nationalization is a capitalist process; it is not a socialist process, as the left-wingers have always propagated, in the same manner that national liberation is a capitalist process, the liberated ones are the national bourgeoisie, and the best example is the Viet Cong.
There was a long process of struggles between the so-called Chinese “communists” and among the Maoists for power and economic control. Like in China, Maoism became a student movement
The works of Mao Zedong ( Mao Tse Tung ) do not describe deeply the process of the Chinese society; and Mao did not have any deep knowledge and understanding about Marxism and socialism, his followers created the so-called Mao Tse Tung thought.
The real facts have been written by outside sources, including Enver Hoxha, who said that Maoism was modern Confucianism
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hoxha/works/imp_rev/imp_ch6.htm
—————————————————————–
Many among the national bourgeoisie, very weak in the 1930s, increasingly preferred the Red areas, if they could reach them, and moved to the Japanese areas if not, rather than stay in the KMT, the same study said. I don’t know if it was true.
It was the foreign bourgeoisie that preferred Chiang, although he personally despised them. They had initially feared him as “The Red General.”
————————————————–
The main ally of Chiang was the US capitalist class, who called them imperialist, and he declared himself an anti-imperialist like the Japanese and Italian capitalist class it does shows that anti-imperialism can be used by the right-wingers and the left-wingers. Chiang retreated to Taiwan with the main purpose of taking over the mainland China territory. The whole process is a history of rivalry among capitalists
Doesn’t one of the stars on the flag of the Chinese state represent the “national bourgeoisie”?
———————————————–
It does, and the four stars represent the four Chinese social classes, including the so-called petty bourgeoisie. The CPC allied with the bourgeoisie class
The Chinese Revolution was a peasant revolution that led to the establishment of a capitalist society, similar to the Bolshevik coup and the French bourgeois revolution, with the only difference that feudalism did not exist in China. It was what Marx called the Asiatic mode of production
In Cuba, one sector of the bourgeoisie class also supported the guerrillas, and it was also a bourgeois nationalist revolution, similar to the rest of the nationalist revolutions that have taken place in Latin America
Lenin supported the theory of the permanent revolution because it applies to economically backward societies.
We have an article that says that Bolshevism is a combination of Kautsky’s theory of the vanguard party and Trotsky’s theory of the permanent revolution
———————————————————————–
ste finch
Participant
Adri/Citizen, Thanks for the info you posted, but please be aware that I didn’t post the GT article for any historical or theoretical acuity – I put it there because GT is a CCP mouthpiece – so the article should be useful in countering the nonsense usually spouted about ‘socialist’ China
—————————————————
We know it was your intention; we all do that around here. I am always publishing articles from different sourcesEverything is written in this book:
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1924/foundations-leninism/. Foundations of Leninism by Joseph StalinProbably, Vladimir Lenin wouldn’t have created a concept known as Marxism-Leninism; he did not want to be mummified either; he wanted to be placed next to his mother. In some way, Lenin sincerely recognized some of his mistakes, he also recognized that the vanguard party was just a temporary measure applicable to Russia, and he was not going to edit and publish again What is to be done?
Without the Soviet Union, socialism/communism would have been in a much better state in our time. The concept of socialism/communism was distorted by them and by the Western capitalists; any reformer is called socialist or communist, any third-world dictator, guerrilla fighter, or terrorist is called communist. With the emergence of right-wing populists, the situation is even worseThat article from Global Times does not express the real historical situation. The so-called privatization in China is an ancient process. ( In this journal, some of whose members were Maoists ), has written several articles about the privatization in China, which they call neoliberalism.
The privatization is part of the so-called Four Modernizations, initiated after the elimination of the so-called Gang of Four, Some Maoists call it a party coup done by Deng Xiaoping
https://www.communistvoice.org/19cChinaHinton.html
https://www.communistvoice.org/17cChina.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Modernizations
The RCPUSA, which is a Maoist organization, has already written about the long process of Chinese privatization
The temporary ending of this conflict is going to be similar to the ending of World War 2. All imperialist and capitalist powers are going to distribute among themselves the Ukrainian territory and its resources; in the meantime, thousands of human beings have died defending the so-called homeland
Lenin was not a communist.
Leninism is not a communist trend
Marxism-Leninism is an incompatible hybrid created by Joseph Stalin.
The only Russian leader who had a real conception of socialism/communism was Julius Martov.
The soviet leaders never claimed that they were building a communist society.
The whole period of more than 75 years they were developing state capitalism.
The whole history of the USRR as a socialist society it is just a lie
