Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Points taken. But can Putin afford to keep demolishing his credibility as a head of state by going out of his way to issue extreme and sensational bluffs?
When all this began with the abandonment of the Russia-EU pipeline, it was Germany and the EU reluctant in supporting the US/UK anti-Russia stance, but now it’s the EU urging permission for missiles to hit Russia regardless of Putin’s warning, and following the UK, which has left the EU!
Why has the EU become again more gung ho for war than even the US?Can Starmer go ahead with the missile permission without US approval, embroiling NATO in war with Russia?
Starmer urged to let missiles be used on Russia without waiting for US approval.
The Churchill complex. All British PMs want to play Churchill, “directing” a war down in a govt bunker amid the accolades of flag-waving morons.
At least at the UN more states will be involved, and I don’t see them allowing it. Britain isn’t popular in Europe as it is, and the US Democrats won’t want another major war putting off voters this side of the election. Am I right?
But it’s up to the US, and the UK is doing all it can to get bombing permission.
France doesn’t count here, since it’ll be precipitated by Britain.Putin might not want war with NATO, but maybe NATO wants war with Russia. The way they are all massed on the borders …
I think number 3 on your list is the strongest motive.
No one ever questions the arms before butter factor, but they do complain about MPs vacations etc.
Workers at arms factories will support Starmer, because it will keep them in work.
Russia cannot afford to do nothing in retaliation. As a capitalist state, it can’t just roll over. The West is counting on it doing so and is prepared to sacrifice our lives by “calling the bluff.”
Russia’s credibility as a state is on the line for Putin.
