Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
It is surely known before Trump came on the scene that NATO expansion was the issue for Russia. It has nothing to do with Trump saying so. We already knew it.
“I perceive glee in Trump’s actions among some comrades. Not good.”
Anything that stops the war has got to be good, although we know Trump’s priorities are not ours.
How can Putin possibly agree to a Ukraine still being supplied with weaponry and turned into an armed camp against Russia? Surely that’s no different than a NATO state?
The whole purpose of a buffer state is that it should be neutral, isn’t it?
https://www.ft.com/content/dc9c51ab-03cb-47ba-ad0a-09c4deed9b50
Restarting Nordstream 2?
Yes.
Starmer et al are talking as though they’ll be allowed to send troops to Ukraine. They won’t. If they try unilaterally, they’ll incur Trump’s wrath as well as Putin’s. Well, there won’t be a peace deal if they do.Is that what Starmer’s hoping then with his theatrics? To scupper any deal?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgwwyrnpzdo
Gene Hackman.
The original Leninist party at least not jumping on Starmer’s wagon.
