Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Thomas_More
ParticipantEnglish protestantism was Calvinist. Within this grew a plethora, beginning with Puritans within the Church of England wanting to “purify” the Church of its Catholic rituals. Unhappy with bishops, the Nonconformists left the Church and themselves divided into Presbyterians and Independents, both strict Calvinists. Never was Lutheranism on the English scene.
The proto-communists you associate with the Puritans, like the Diggers and Ranters, owe more to the Anabaptists than the Puritans. Anabaptists, and Quakers are not protestants and were persecuted by the established churches and by the Puritans. They may have been splinters from the Reformation but their kind are pre-protestant too, and owe more to the Waldensians and such groups.
I was tracing the Nazis back to both Luther’s anti-semitism and to the fossilization of the German princedoms caused by Luther’s revolt – a fossilization which put a 20th century Germany in conflict with the colonial powers of Britain and France.
I never said all or most of the German proletariat were anti-semitic, but a majority were, and responded as expected to the scapegoating of the Jews.
Thomas_More
ParticipantThe evolution of the nation-state spans over the religious sects. Where Catholicism retained control did not mean feudalism did. Mercantile capitalism thrived in both Catholic and Protestant countries, and both amassed colonial territories and wealth.
There were protestant feudal rulers, in Germany and central Europe. The powerful Nadasdy-Bathorys in Hungary for instance.
-
This reply was modified 17 hours, 59 minutes ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
ParticipantEngland was relatively late on the colonial scene and dependent on piracy on Spanish and Portuguese shipping. These Catholic kingdoms were the superpowers, already with vast empires – not possible for feudal states.
Thomas_More
ParticipantSpain was the first nation-state and became the first superpower. Its bishops and its inquisition were autonomous of the Popes, and their first loyalty was to the monarch.
The Catholic Counter Reformation was actually the Catholic Reformation. It did away with the medieval Church and created a new organisation, streamlined and useful as a colonial force. You cannot equate Catholicism everywhere with the feudal system, like medieval Catholicism.
In France the Church also enjoyed autonomy and under Richelieu it led state centralisation demolishing regional defences and increasing the power of the throne.Thomas_More
ParticipantThe first nation-state, Spain, was Catholic. Later, the Counter Reformation made the Catholic Church in Catholic countries a revolutionary force, streamlined, and a colonial force, competing with protestant states and also aligning with them (i.e. France in the Thirty Years War).
Thomas_More
ParticipantGoogle: ” England never officially adopted Lutheranism as its state religion, although Lutheran ideas and theology had a significant, albeit limited, influence on the early English Reformation. While the Church of England broke with Rome under Henry VIII, the resulting Anglicanism was a distinct, often political, structure that did not fully embrace the theological principles of Martin Luther.
Reddit
Reddit
+4
Key Reasons Lutheranism Was Not Adopted
Political vs. Theological Reformation: The English Reformation was initiated by Henry VIII for political reasons (securing a divorce) rather than theological convictions like those driving the German Lutheran movements.
Henry VIII’s Conservatism: Henry VIII considered himself a traditional Catholic and personally attacked Martin Luther in his 1521 publication Assertio Septem Sacramentorum, earning the title “Defender of the Faith” from the Pope.
Deviation from Lutheran Doctrine: The Church of England never officially accepted the core Lutheran confessional documents, such as the Augsburg Confession, and retained more elements of medieval Catholic structure (like bishops).
Shift to Reformed/Calvinist Ideas: Following Henry VIII, the English church moved toward Reformed (Calvinist) theology, particularly during the reign of Edward VI, which differed significantly from Luther’s views on the Eucharist.”Thomas_More
ParticipantEvangelical Christianity is Calvinist. Trump’s Church of Prosperity espouses the Calvinist view in championing capital and big business. American Christianity is Calvinist, as the Mayflower “Pilgrims” were.
Thomas_More
ParticipantThe Tudors never adopted Lutheranism. Protestants were burned by Henry VIII, who was never a Protestant. The protestantism allowed in by Edward VI and consolidated by Elizabeth I was Calvinist. The Low Church in Anglicanism is Calvinist, and that’s where the Puritans emerged from.
The victory of the German feudals delayed capitalist development in Germany. This development was boosted by the Kings of Prussia, esp Frederick the Great in the 18th century. It was under the aegis of the Prussian monarchy, the Kaisers, who were both Kings of Prussia and Emperors of Germany, that Bismarck united the principalities into the nation-state. Nothing to do with Lutheranism.
Thomas_More
ParticipantLuther may have kickstarted the Reformation, but he didn’t represent the bourgeoisie and welcomed the protection of the feudals.
Lutheranism wasn’t very different from Catholicism in ritual; it was the followers of Calvin, who came to include John Knox and the Puritans in England, who really made their churches home to the merchant class, doing away altogether with not only the rites of the Catholic Church, but with any regard for the poor and dispossessed, making poverty a sin and financial prosperity the highest, sacred, virtue.Thomas_More
Participant“TM – No Luther – no Calvin”
???
Thomas_More
ParticipantSo what is Europe trying to do? And what are they getting out of it by continuing the Biden line?
Once they get rid of Orban tomorrow, they’ll be giving another 90 billion euros to Zelensky. Meanwhile Norway is helping Ukraine in the north. Hungarian youth are convinced Kiev is winning and are shouting russophobic slogans.
-
This reply was modified 1 day, 8 hours ago by
Thomas_More.
-
This reply was modified 1 day, 8 hours ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
ParticipantDel.
-
This reply was modified 1 day, 23 hours ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
ParticipantThe Nazis also instituted far more protections for nonhuman animals than any other modern nation-state has done.
https://share.google/Cn92KbVuocWYWPHmd
-
This reply was modified 2 days, 18 hours ago by
Thomas_More.
-
This reply was modified 2 days, 18 hours ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
ParticipantThe German feudal princes adopted Luther and put a spanner in the development of state centralisation, which had the effect of fossilizing Germany, just as the East was fossilized re: the development of capitalism. Germany was to miss out on the colonial game and on industrial growth until Bismarck united the Reich. This resulted in Germany needing to try and expand, and Hitler was correct in identifying Britain as the main power suffocating German capitalist aspirations.
Catholic power wasn’t always the reactionary force in Europe. It worked to centralise state power in France via Gallicanism, and in Germany, via the Emperor, it tried to, but was scuppered by the Lutheran princes.Now, Calvinism, on the other hand, was a merchants’ creed, and was revolutionary. There would even be, for a time, Catholic Calvinists, called Jansenists.
The Catholic Counter Reformation was a revolutionary phenomenon, whereas Lutheranism was reactionary.
Lutheran protestantism was also embraced by Hungarian and other central European nobles asserting feudal rights against the Hapsburgs.-
This reply was modified 2 days, 19 hours ago by
Thomas_More.
Thomas_More
ParticipantJapan put a motion to the League of Nations in the 1920s to outlaw the bombing of civilians in wartime, but Britain vetoed it.
-
This reply was modified 17 hours, 59 minutes ago by
-
AuthorPosts
