Is it acceptable for moderators to allow pseudonyms, anonymous, sock puppets and trolls on the forum to attack other forum membersr?
Their function is clear: Provocotion and justification for moderation to suspend others. We all know who these pricks are. Why does admin protect them?
It is clear that SPGB members are using pseudonyms or sock puppets to attack me on this forum. Why is admin allowing this and just how many cowards are in the SPGB. The law protects people from libel even when perpetrated by pseudonyms and sock puppets and it is the responsibilty of the SPGB to ensure that its forum does not leave it open to prosecution.I again request that the comments are removed in good faith: They serve no purpose and reflect badly on the SPGB
If Neo-Fascists and Neo-Nazists continue winning election and taking control of the state pretty soon we will come back to the old days of using pseudonyms like the members of the vanguard party
Reminder: 14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules.
Reminder: 14. Rule enforcement is the responsibility of the moderators, not of the contributors. If you believe a post or private message violates a rule, report it to the moderators. Do not take it upon yourself to chastise others for perceived violations of the rules.
So if you disagree with Johnstone over his murderous attitude to unborn babies that makes you a troll? I think I am beginning to understand why you get so many abusive posts.