Young Master Smeet

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,056 through 2,070 (of 3,101 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Election – Campaign News #108335

    I like how both our candidates answered differently, and both correctly within party policy.  It's good we have some some for style and personal presentation.

    in reply to: General Election – Campaign News #108332

    Lo All,should have sent this yesterday, this is the response we got to our complaint about leaflet dumping:

    Quote:
    The delivery officer, whose postal route includes the specified address, has confirmed that the mail was delivered into the individual post boxes for the tenants at the block of flats.  The delivery officer has advised also that tenants often deposit unaddressed mail, originally delivered into the boxes, either on top of the post boxes, or on the floor around them.
    in reply to: Russell Brand #107618

    http://www.alastaircampbell.org/blog/2015/04/29/why-ed-was-right-to-see-brand-and-why-it-is-dacre-murdoch-and-cameron-who-are-the-real-rusty-rockets/

    Alastair Campbell wrote:
    As for the idea that it sets Brand up as some kind of serious commentator on politics, he already was. That is why it is Cameron, Murdoch and Dacre who are the jokes here, not Brand and certainly not Miliband.

    Well worth a read, a well written peice, and whatever you think of the man's politics, he remains a clever operator.

    in reply to: General Election – Campaign News #108320

    Alan,I did make that clear, but a formatting error vanished it. I ended that one "</personal rant>"Anyway,Full interview wih Adam Here:http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b05vdx7t/election-2015-socialist-party-of-great-britain-manifesto-launch

    in reply to: General Election – Campaign News #108318

    Islington Gazette online hustings (link)This was last night.  As I'm sure you all know, I'm loathe to have an argument over the internet.  But.  Well.  Someone had to do it…

    in reply to: General Election – Campaign News #108312

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2015-32478443They're recycling Danny's clip rather than any footage from Sunday, it seems…

    in reply to: General Election – Campaign News #108287

    Max, can you email any addresses you have to nlb.spgb@gmail.com — I have a complaint in train.  I'll be speaking to otehr candidates this afternoon.

    in reply to: General Election – Campaign News #108274

    I've put in a complaint.  Newington Green isn't even in the constituency.

    in reply to: Fracking – hydraulic fracturing #99846

    Yes, I would, and the conference resolution you've cited, to my mind, is no barrier to fracking per se…

    in reply to: Fracking – hydraulic fracturing #99844

    Put another way, we will need gold in socialism for electronics, etc. So, will we continue to use cyanide extraction is socialism?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_mining#Cyanide_processMy bet is almost certainly yes.

    in reply to: Fracking – hydraulic fracturing #99843

    Just to bring the discussion back here.  So, even if any of our candidtes are personally against fracking, they are of course pledged to vote for it is the party instructs them to do so after a democratic debate.A couple of drive by quotes from Wikipedia:

    Public Health England wrote:
    "An assessment of the currently available evidence indicates that the potential risks to public health from exposure to the emissions associated with shale gas extraction will be low if the operations are properly run and regulated. Most evidence suggests that contamination of groundwater, if it occurs, is most likely to be caused by leakage through the vertical borehole. Contamination of groundwater from the underground hydraulic fracturing process itself (ie the fracturing of the shale) is unlikely. However, surface spills of hydraulic fracturing fluids or wastewater may affect groundwater, and emissions to air also have the potential to impact on health. Where potential risks have been identified in the literature, the reported problems are typically a result of operational failure and a poor regulatory environment."

    and

    Quote:
    Hydraulic fracturing fluids include proppants and other chemicals. These may include toxic chemicals;[3] In the United States they are allowed to be treated as trade secrets by companies who use them. Lack of knowledge about specific chemicals has complicated efforts to develop risk management policies and to study health effects.[4][5] In other jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, these chemicals must be made public and are required to be non hazardous in their application

    Now, my view is that fracking is probably no more harmful than any other extractive industry, per se, but that for AGW reasons that gas/oil should stay in the ground.  As a party member, if I wa given the choice between 5,000+ deaths from winter cold and fracking, I'd vote for fracking, and expect our delegates to abide by the vote.

    in reply to: General Election – Campaign News #108261
    Quote:
    8-9pm: "Come and hear why you should vote for Socialism" Election meeting at Caxton House Community Centre, 129 St John's Way , London N19 3RQ (7 mins from Archway tube). Our candidate, Bill Martin, will give a talk and answer questions.

    We advertised this meeting, so it'll be a good test of the power of advertising.  Anyone free in London welcome to come along.

    in reply to: The History of Socialist Thought #110721

    A history of British socialism Author:Max BeerPublisher:London : G. Allen & Unwin Ltd., [1953]The general history of socialism and social struggles. Author:Max BeerPublisher:New York, Russell & Russell [1957](The latter goes back to ancient times, and may be a little tendentious). Socialism by James Ramsay MacDonald  Print book View all formats and languages »Language: English Publisher: New York : Kraus Reprint Co., 1970.  IIRC it's an interesting account, that starts with Godwin, read with pinch of salt. Also:William Morris and E. Belfort BaxSocialism From The Root UporSocialism Its Growth & Outcome https://www.marxists.org/archive/morris/works/1886/sru/

    in reply to: General Election – Campaign News #108234

    Looks like today is Republic day.  Here's my email I sent:

    Quote:
    The Socialist Party is campaigning for the creation of a society based on common ownership of the wealth of the world, so that it can be directly administered in all our interests, rather than in the interest of the minority who currently own it.Our core principles affirm that we intend to "overthrow of privilege, aristocratic and plutocratic" and that includes replacing the monarchy, and government, with the self-active democracy of the population. If our delegates find themselves serving as a minority in a parliament dominated by pro-capitalist parties, our membership will instruct them to vote (after a democratic debate) in the best interests of the working class.
    in reply to: General Election – Campaign News #108224

    Islignton Gazette Hustings last night, full slate of candidates.  It was a bit hectic, the chair moved the goalposts a couple of times, and at one point it turned into a version of Juat a Minute with candidates having to quickly work through about 10 questions each.  Got a couple of points across, that seem to have been picked up on the twitter feeds (search for Islington North and scroll down).  Kind of fluffed my last lines (partly because the chair suddenly told us that instead of summation, our last batch of answers was a wind up as well). I made it about 60 present.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,056 through 2,070 (of 3,101 total)