Thomas_More

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,171 through 1,185 (of 3,027 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Tensions #257308
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Warmonger news.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257304
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    That’s ok, Roberto.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257299
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Everywhere, all across Europe and the US, the workers and the Leftists are opposing Trump over Ukraine and supporting the Democrats and Britain in opposing a Trump/Putin peace.

    The Left is in no way class conscious. It is still in thrall to the slogan of “national liberation.”

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257298
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    ” but that does not mean we should be in favor of peace.” ?

    This is obviously a mistake in English.

    Every time Ukraine gets missiles and fires them into Russia we know Russian missiles will follow into Ukraine. How can those moaning about cutting weapons to Ukraine, or anywhere, can bring peace? Ukraine will never be able to end the war that way, just prolong it.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257293
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    It is surely known before Trump came on the scene that NATO expansion was the issue for Russia. It has nothing to do with Trump saying so. We already knew it.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257283
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    “I perceive glee in Trump’s actions among some comrades. Not good.”

    Anything that stops the war has got to be good, although we know Trump’s priorities are not ours.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257274
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Starmer must know that. What is he playing at?

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257272
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    How can Putin possibly agree to a Ukraine still being supplied with weaponry and turned into an armed camp against Russia? Surely that’s no different than a NATO state?

    The whole purpose of a buffer state is that it should be neutral, isn’t it?

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257266
    Thomas_More
    Participant
    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257265
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Yes.
    Starmer et al are talking as though they’ll be allowed to send troops to Ukraine. They won’t. If they try unilaterally, they’ll incur Trump’s wrath as well as Putin’s. Well, there won’t be a peace deal if they do.

    Is that what Starmer’s hoping then with his theatrics? To scupper any deal?

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257263
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Thanks.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257260
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Says page does not exist.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257258
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    That is a great link, Robbo.

    in reply to: Russian Tensions #257257
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    Deleted.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 7 months ago by Thomas_More.
    in reply to: Film #257230
    Thomas_More
    Participant

    The Klansman.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,171 through 1,185 (of 3,027 total)