Thomas_More
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
But it obliges all of NATO to officially declare war, whereas at the moment it is unofficial. And surely, where Europe is concerned, an official and open war with Russia could not but be nuclear.
What if Article 5 is triggered? Movimiento says no nuclear weapons will ever be used, but, because of Article 5, NATO will be obliged to, won’t it?
Youtubers are really hyping up the nuclear war angle; really pushing catastrophism.
Do you think all this military muscle-flexing by all states at the moment is to divert workers from class issues and climate change? And to reinforce patriotic hysteria?
What is the real reason they are doing all this now, more than the usual?
Now that TS is gone, I want to ask again: why is Russia the only power constantly threatening nuclear use?
Russia keeps saying its goals are basically achieved. This means control of the south and east. If that is so, then partition would be a way out. Would NATO then admit western Ukraine? The problem is, how would they prevent a NATO west Ukraine from continuing to shell the Russian east? (Which likewise would force NATO and Russia into war with each other?
Newsweek.com:
” NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that Ukraine will eventually become a member of the transatlantic alliance, but he and national leaders including President Joe Biden have made clear that this is a long-term goal.”
65,000 nuclear bunkers prepared in Sweden (Underground Worlds, tonight on the Yesterday channel).
300,000 bunkers in Switzerland.
Their bunkers are the size of cities. They have apartments for workers, servants; restaurants, etc., and artificial sunlight; gardens, etc.
https://spyscape.com/article/billionaire-bunkers-the-worlds-most-exclusive-safe-houses
The alert will be next Sunday. The article above reveals what it is really for.
Thanks, Robbo. Agree absolutely.
What about Ekonomikos’ article in the Standard, which says world war is unlikely?
Something’s lurking around the corner – but it isn’t a world war
