Bijou Drains
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
True Nazi wrote “I didn’t want to be rude but how the hell would he know what the Nazi was thinking?”
Perhaps READING and trying to COMPREHEND what he wrote might help you.
Chelmsford actually wrote “I don’t think they were really ‘Nazis’, they were not into ideology, political theory and all that palaver, they just enjoyed a good punch-up.”
He used the words “I don’t think they were really Nazis”
You will note he said THINK, that signifies an OPINION.
If he had said “KNOW” (which is the word you used), that would have meant he was stating a fact. Which he wasn’t. So just to clarify for you, he said he thought it, he didn’t say he knew it.
Your comment also raises the question “how the hell” he would have reached that opinion (not know it as you state)
Well, to be fair to Chelmsford he gave you a little clue. If you read a little further (take it slowly, I don’t want to stress you out) he also said “they were not into ideology, political theory and all that palaver,” which allowed him to EXPLAIN the reason for the OPINION he expressed.
Not only that, he very kindly offered an opposing theory to explain their Nazi style behaviour “they just enjoyed a good punch-up”.
To add to the joy our readers get from your ability to misunderstand practically everything, you then move on to congratulate Chelmsford for punching a Nazi, where in fact Chelmsford wrote that he “somehow tottered up to this huge skinhead and…purchased a copy of Spearhead.”
What Chelmsford was showing was SELF DEPRECIATING HUMOUR. He was laughing at his lack of bravery as he didn’t confront the skinhead, he bought a copy of his magazine. Spearhead was the magazine of the National Front. Through this device of self deprecation he was also inviting us to join him in laughing at the nature of the human condition, i.e. being attracted to a young woman but not being able to follow up his attraction due to his (very understandable) fear of said skinhead.
So when referring to later developments, Chelmsford stated that “Fortunately this was the late 1970’s and there was still plenty of NHS dental treatment available and I only paid a nominal sum toward the upper denture. And you know I still have that relic of the anti-‘Nazi’ struggle in me gob. I do look like Albert Steptoe though”
What Chelmsford was implying, through the use of IRONIC HUMOUR, that the result of the confrontation was it HE WAS PUNCHED IN THE MOUTH and it was indeed Chelmsford who lost his teeth. That is why he said “I only paid a nominal sum towards the upper denture.
The final section of his beautifully developed contribution ended with “I do look like Albert Steptoe” related to a 1960s-79s Situation Comedy which had a character based an old rag and bone man named Albert Steptoe who was well known for his poor oral hygiene and his dentures. Another humorous and ironic aside.
Comprehension’s not your strong suit, then really what is?
On the plus side, we can add “understanding the way that the English Language” works to your ever increasing list of things you don’t understand.
Apologies to Chelmsford, humour does tend to suffer a little when it’s deconstructed for idiots.
True Nazi
“Great anecdote. Good on you for punching a Nazi.”
So we can add bathos into the list of concepts you don’t understand.
😂😂😂True Nazi “My god you people are dim.”
Not dim enough to fall for Hitler’s words masquerading as Putin’s.
If you can fall for that one, what other Nazi inspired bullshit are you falling for.
😂😂😂True Nazi – “Lol. All-in with the ruling elite thinks the Economist publishes “facts”. How many times your mama drop you on your head as an infant? Honest question.”
Just to enlighten you a little, Karl Marx regularly used The Economist (founded in 1843). His work, which you admit you have never read, has many, many references to his work.
Are you not starting to get a bit sick of making yourself look like a fool?
True Nazi said “ There, fixed it for you. Honest question, does anyone here take Alan seriously?”
Said the guy who agreed wholeheartedly with the words of Hitler, just because he was told they came from Putin.
Words, by the way he has yet to disown.
“But where are the clowns
Send in the clowns
Don’t bother, they’re here”ALB “ Something has gone wrong with the Western censors. I can get RT again on my phone.”
Looks like it’s been taken off line again. Maybe MI6 put some more pennies in their leccy meter
ALB, for the sake of consistency I assume that our resident Hitlerite/Stalinist will be part of a campaign starting out a campaign to return the Polish borders to their pre WW2 state and will be raising questions about the estimated 3-4 million Poles who were ethnically cleansed by the Soviet state and forced west of the Curzon line.
True Nazi – “I think this is all about daddy issues for you lot. You got spanked too much as a child and now rebel against all authority”
I think you have quite beautifully demonstrated one of the problems with relying on leaders, without any thought.
Followers like you are happy to follow what their leaders (or follow Hitler if you think it’s your leader) say blindly.
So seriously, True Nazi, we have you on record supporting Hitler’s views on the Sudeten German question, do you still support the speech you praised so enthusiastically?
AH – “I am resolved to remove from Russian frontiers the element of uncertainty, the everlasting atmosphere of conditions resembling civil war. I will see to it that in the West there is, on the frontier, a peace precisely similar to that on our other frontiers.””
And there you have it. Plain as day.
Perhaps not as plain as you think.
The speech you applaud so vigorously wasn’t a speech by Putin about the Ukraine. I changed Germany to Russia and Czechoslovakia to Ukraine.
The speech you support was made by a certain Adolf Hitler about the Sudeten Germans in 1938.
So considering that you think that all Nazi supporters should be shot, perhaps you should consider shooting your self!!
TW appears (not for the first time) to be confused. On the one side he has frequently said he supports the Chinese regime, a regime that has said that Sovereignty should be upheld, yet on the other hand he supports the frontier change that Putin is trying to impose by force.
Let’s not forget that the reasons that Putin start of this was the “mistreatment” of ethnic Russians in The Ukraine and the possible expansion of the EU and or NATO.
The speech below was made BEFORE the Crimean/Donbas occupation, it shows that the aim was border change from the very beginning, not a resolution that solved these “problems” in any other way.
“I am determined to solve (1) the Ukrainian question and (2) to see to it that a change is made in the relationship between Russia and The Ukraine that shall ensure a peaceful co-existence. In this I am resolved to continue to fight until either the present Ukrainian government is willing to continue to bring about this frontier change or until another Ukrainian Government is ready to do so. I am resolved to remove from Russian frontiers the element of uncertainty, the everlasting atmosphere of conditions resembling civil war. I will see to it that in the West there is, on the frontier, a peace precisely similar to that on our other frontiers.”
So what is it, TW do you support the aim of frontier change as it was outlined above? In the light of the recent China, is the pre war statement still a reasonable one that you are happy about? It’s a straightforward question, are you happy with the ideas that were put forward in the speech, or do you not?
But surely your “Marxist” heroes have stated that “sovereignty of all countries should be upheld”.
But what about Putin’s 2021 speech about Russians in the Ukraine.
“And I have further assured him that at the moment when Ukraine solves its problems, that means when the Ukrainians have come to terms with their other minorities, and that peaceably and not through oppression, then I have no further interest in the Ukrainian state.”
How can you square what China are saying whilst still supporting Putin?
Tinky Winky “Your “party” is too ineffectual to be an MI6 op.”
I thought for a very short while that maybe TW might have worked in some kind of Russian Bot factory, but on reflection I do not think even they would put his shite up as counterpropaganda.
That said if he is a bot, he’s stealing a bloody living, negative surplus value, so to speak.
Also if, despite the strong contrary evidence, it turns out that he is a bot, I would keep away from the windows of any high rise buildings if I was him. If the Russians find out what a piss poor job he is doing, he’s likely to go for a very short, vertical, flying lesson.
Oh and if our Party was a UK secret service set up, it would be MI5 (UK based intelligence services) not MI6 (overseas intelligence services), and to think TW is always so well informed about these kind of things.
Just another thing to add to the long list of things he doesn’t understand (Marxism, Leninism, idealism, materialism, geography, history, how to read a calendar, his arse from his elbow)
