twitter account @worldsocialism.com

July 2024 Forums World Socialist Movement twitter account @worldsocialism.com

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 164 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #116245
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    robert.cox wrote:
    Vin, I don't think the IC mislead the EC on this matter at all. It was actually brought to my attention by another member before I saw the report to the EC, and I looked at the Twitter site using a link I was sent by email and it wasn't obvious to me who was running it.Anyway its resolved now.YFS

     Just to clarify, the Motion 14 was motivated by an email from the Internet Commttee? The IC claimed it did not know the owner of the account @world_socialism. This was a misrepresentation.

    #116246
    steve colborn
    Participant

    Is this the IC that have previous?

    #116247
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Lol plenty of it. Remember whe we were abused and verbally attacked anf they did fuck all about it. Nice to be able to talk freely isnt it. without fascist controling mods

    #116248
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    So Robert did the IC mislead the EC?

    #116249
    Tim Kilgallon wrote:
    Then taking into account all you have said, why is their no account (hence accountability) from the IC as to why Cde Marratty (who has passed his speaker and candidate test) was turned down from taking over the official twitter account. I'm not saying I agree with or disagree with the decision, just saying I have no information about the reasoning for that decision and as such cannot hold the IC accountable for the correctness or otherwise of that decision. Do you see my point?

    Sorry, I meant to reply to this one over the weekend. Per:http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/world-socialist-movement/twitter-account-worldsocialismcom?page=7#comment-30391It seems the IC had different plans for the account, and wanted a companion party to operate it.  That has no reflection on Cde. Marratty, AFAICS, buit simply a different idea for how to use it. 

    #116250
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Young Master Smeet wrote:
    Per:http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/world-socialist-movement/twitter-account-worldsocialismcom?page=7#comment-30391It seems the IC had different plans for the account, and wanted a companion party to operate it.  That has no reflection on Cde. Marratty, AFAICS, buit simply a different idea for how to use it. 

    I cannot see how you can make such a  claim based on one members assertion. It is nowhwre near accurate It is all a matter of recordI will be preparing my acount of the IC's inaccurate and misleadng statements to present to my branch. In the meantime I would appreciate if members would desist reposting and repeating  statements as if they are established fact.While online records show differently.  .

    #116251

    For those of you who dabble in English:

    My Evil Self wrote:
    It seems…

     Anyway,http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/forum/world-socialist-movement/twitter-and-reformism?page=2#comment-28190Would seem to substantiate that seeming.

    #116252
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    ooppps forgot

    #116253
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    And who has the account now cde? 

    #116254
    #116255
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Young Master Smeet wrote:
    I dont know

    Thought you didn't 

    #116256

    However, I don't see what that has to do with anything.The bottom line seems to be:1) You asked IC to carry out a project2) They declinedMuch fuss about little. 

    #116257
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    That is inaccurate and even if it were true then why was the branch refused ? Shouldn't the IC be accountable to the membership. Shouldnt it give an account why it refuses to talk to a branch? Or allow it to run a party outlet?

    #116258

    Well, the branch wasn't 'refused' if the IC wanted to do something different with the account. Still not seeing a problem really.  Get a different twitter handle.

    #116259
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    Young Master Smeet wrote:
    Well, the branch wasn't 'refused' if the IC wanted to do something different with the account. Still not seeing a problem really.  Get a different twitter handle.

    We did and the IC interfered which resulted in an EC resolution to disown the accountCde, you are commenting on a situation you know very little about,  so pleae avail yourself of the facts first

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 164 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.