imposs1904

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 824 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Boxing and moral judgments #256797
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Fun fact. Robert Barltrop, of The Monument ‘fame’, was a boxer in his youth.

    Link to the obligatory Socialist Standard article on boxing from yesteryear:

    Ignoble art (1986)

    • This reply was modified 12 months ago by imposs1904.
    in reply to: Further to the meeting of why people leave the party #256731
    imposs1904
    Participant

    “As an aside could I ask why people leaving the party was a subject for discussion in the first place? I would have thought, when compared to other political parties or voluntary organisations in general, the churn of members was quite low. Has this recently changed?”

    That wasn’t the original topic of the meeting, but as the meeting progressed it strayed into that territory because of the anecdotal nature of the discussion.

    It was an interesting and chatty discussion – and I’m not being dismissive in describing it as chatty – but I wouldn’t read too much into why the discussion took that turn.

    in reply to: Post capitalism video #256614
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Robbo203 wrote:

    “. . . I cannot see any reason why the party should not advertise it.”

    Maybe an alternative is for it to be reviewed in the Standard?

    There’s an argument to be made that there should be expanded review section in the Standard that would cover the review of podcasts and video essays from YouTube and elsewhere.

    • This reply was modified 1 year ago by imposs1904.
    in reply to: Gary´s Economics #256501
    imposs1904
    Participant

    PJS wrote an article about him in the December 2022 issue of the Socialist Standard:

    https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2023/12/gb-news-and-garys-economics-2022.html

    He’s also mentioned briefly in this Proper Gander TV column from the March 2022 issue of the Socialist Standard:

    https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2022/03/proper-gander-where-wealth-went-2022.html

    in reply to: US oligarchy #256304
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Woke up to this bollocks. What a time to be alive!

    Bezos, Zuckerberg, Pichai join Trump at church

    “Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Meta boss Mark Zuckerberg, Apple leader Tim Cook, and Google chief Sundar Pichai were seen taking their prime seats at St John’s Church.
    Media tycoon Rupert Murdoch, FIFA president Gianni Infantino and former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson were also spotted at the church.”

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgpqeq82rvo

    • This reply was modified 1 year ago by imposs1904.
    in reply to: Underplayed Classics #256236
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Apologies if I’ve posted this before. Old but gold:

    in reply to: The Starmer Labour government #256040
    imposs1904
    Participant

    “Anything new about this? Will it help?”

    I think what’s fascinating about stuff like this is that it’s another indication of how short-lived the current Labour government’s ‘honeymoon period’ was. I think it’s unprecedented in recent political history that a political party which had won a landslide in seats has pissed off so many people in such a short period of time. (An indication of the current political climate, no doubt.)

    Once upon a time, a dissident current within the Labour Party would have denounced a Labour govt’s actions but would have stayed in the party and fought their political corner. In Broxtowe, they obviously don’t see that as an option in 2024 . . . and that’s only 6 months into this Labour government.

    This is a one-term government.

    in reply to: The Starmer Labour government #256027
    imposs1904
    Participant

    20 Labour councillors in Broxtowe, Nottinghamshire, resign their party membership in opposition to Starmer’s Labour govt policies:

    https://x.com/broxtowelabour/status/1874846754711142707

    Broxtowe Labour

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by imposs1904.
    in reply to: Underplayed Classics #256026
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Wham’s George Michael was a member of the Young Communist League as a teenager.

    Wham played Miners’ Strike benefit gigs during 1984/5.

    in reply to: Socialist Standard Past & Present Blog #256018
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Speed past my waffle at the start of the post. Click on the link for the list of the 20 most popular posts on the Socialist Standard Past and Present blog for the year ending 2024:

    https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2025/01/in-year-2025-if-man-is-still-alive-and.html

    in reply to: Socialist Standard Past & Present Blog #255938
    imposs1904
    Participant

    A selection of Christmas related articles that have appeared in the Socialist Standard down the years:

    https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2024/12/its-cliched-to-be-cynical-at-christmas.html

    With added humbug.

    in reply to: Socialist Standard Past & Present Blog #255912
    imposs1904
    Participant

    I know not everyone is as overly fascinated by the history of the SPGB as I am, but surely this letter from the December 1933 issue of the Socialist Standard piques people’s interest.

    A disputed story that’s so intriguing that it should have featured in The Monument by Barltrop. I’m guessing the Ridley Road debate would have been an outdoor debate:

    https://socialiststandardmyspace.blogspot.com/2015/12/socialism-and-red-shirts-1933.html

    in reply to: The Starmer Labour government #255873
    imposs1904
    Participant

    I know it sounds trite but capitalist politics boils down sometimes to nothing more than a popularity contest, and Starmer has never had that ‘It Factor’, that likeability. I would be genuinely surprised if he was able to turn around his own personal popularity rating to any significant degree.

    He’s a liability for Labour at this point. What’s troubling for Labour is that there’s no popular figure at hand within their ranks to step into his shoes.

    (That’s enough cliches for one post.)

    in reply to: The Starmer Labour government #255817
    imposs1904
    Participant

    “. . . the over overriding message on the door step was anti Starmer and rightly so.”

    I called it. I said in various SPGB Zoom Meetings that Starmer was always a liability for Labour. The question is: will he get ditched by his ‘friends’ and colleagues before the next election?

    I still think this could be a one-term Labour govt.

    If Farage wants it enough – and I’m not sure on that point, tbh – he could be the next UK Prime Minister.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by imposs1904.
    in reply to: Underplayed Classics #255792
    imposs1904
    Participant

    An absolute banger from back in the day:

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 824 total)