imposs1904

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 824 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: A David comes to Judgment #133066
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Arthurton was a member of the SPGB from 1908 to 1940.

    in reply to: peterloo #132847
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Upcoming film by Mike Leigh.

    in reply to: ‘Happy Birthday, Karl Marx’ (Leeds – 1pm) #132828
    imposs1904
    Participant
    Major McPharter wrote:
    Any Tudor crisps and a Pint of vaux.

    'Tudor crisps"? Someone is showing their age . . . and their fine taste in crisps.

    in reply to: Bill Boaks #132772
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Scottish Slang

    in reply to: Debs Movie #132749
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Didn't Bernie Sanders make a 30-minute documentary about Debs in the late 70s/early 80s? Maybe that's online somewhere.

    in reply to: Archie MacPherson #132673
    imposs1904
    Participant
    alanjjohnstone wrote:
    Interesting…This be in the 1940s then, maybe early 1950s, who would the main speakers be? 

    I'm guessing it would have been the likes of John Higgins, Joe Richmond, Alex Shaw, Tony Mulheron and a few others. Dick Donnelly didn't join the SPGB until the late 50s, and Vic Vanni joined the SPGB in Glasgow in the early 60s.

    in reply to: Archie MacPherson #132672
    imposs1904
    Participant
    alanjjohnstone wrote:
    John McGovern and Guy Aldred cited. Sadly no mention of the SPGBGame of Two Halveshttps://books.google.co.th/books?id=RCTpCQAAQBAJ&pg=PT21&lpg=PT21&dq=archie+macpherson+ilp+politics&source=bl&ots=WydsTgn8Cq&sig=PmYFgmQGFbuysLE0uedT60rgvns&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjJ4dqlvdraAhWBo48KHX3YALoQ6AEITjAF#v=onepage&q=archie%20macpherson%20ilp%20politics&f=false

    I bet I'm the only person on the forum who has actually read that book. I knew from the book that he was from an old ILP family. And, of course, the ILP's McGovern was the MP for Shettleston all through from their disaffiliation from the Labour Party in '32 up until McGovern rejoined the Labour Party at the tail end of the forties. That means that the ILP beat the Labour candidate at the '45 landslide Labour election, so you can understand how deep rooted the support was for the ILP and its candidates in Shettleston, Bridgeton (Maxton's seat) and Camlachie in Glasgow all through the thirties and forties.What I thought was funny about Archie mentioning the SPGB in the podcast was that he intially just gave out the intitials SPGB, and then he made a point of saying the SPGB stood for the Socialist Party of Great Britain.

    in reply to: Socialist Standard Past & Present Blog #98952
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Found this old short story of George Bernard Shaw's which dates from 1905 in the PDF of a short story collection by Shaw. (Published in the '30s.)I thought I'd post it on the blog because 1) I enjoyed it. 2) I'd like to think that Shaw was having a dig at the impossibilists of his day. (Yes, I know the 'impossibilist' position is more nuanced than Shaw makes out but since when was it necessary to be exact when throwing out political barbs at your opponents?)Link: Death of an Old Revolutionary Hero by George Bernard Shaw (1905)

    in reply to: Against the Grain #123566
    imposs1904
    Participant

    No, Alan, it's confirmation that we don't currently have any party members who are political scientists/historian hacks who have carved out a wee niche churning out papers, essays or book chapters on the minutiae of the Party history. (There's a gig there for someone if they want it.)I like books like this. I'm interested in books like this, but I also recognise that a lot of it is little more than a circle jerking exercise on the part of academics bleeding dry their Phds, so they can get that chapter in a book like this  . . . or get that seat on the Historical Materialism panel . . .  or get that online article on the Jacobin website.I'm not beating myself up over something as trivial as this.

    in reply to: Against the Grain #123564
    imposs1904
    Participant

    There's a follow up volume to this book by the same editors:Link: Waiting for the revolutionNo idea if we made the footnotes this time.

    in reply to: Funeral of Hugh Armstrong (Glasgow Branch) #131583
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Condolences to you and your family, Raymond, on your sad loss. I met your Dad a couple of times about 15/16 years ago, and he was a good guy.all the best.

    in reply to: Centenary of the Russian Revolution #130203
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Apologies moderators. I'm banning myself from this forum before I get the obvious ban. And, Gnome, you're still a snide cunt.

    in reply to: Centenary of the Russian Revolution #130202
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Fuck off Gnome. You snide cunt.

    in reply to: Centenary of the Russian Revolution #130200
    imposs1904
    Participant

    The actual cost would be minimal. If put in place it would actually reduce the workload at Head Office because people would be purchasing the electronic version of the book online directly from the website. No need to pack it up and mail it out. How do we go about it? I'm in the same boat as you.

    in reply to: Centenary of the Russian Revolution #130198
    imposs1904
    Participant

    Congrats to all involved in its production.One question, though: Should it not also be available to buy as a digital download? It'd be great if people opt for the hard copy, but nowadays we have to take into account that a lot of people read books on kindles, computers and smartphones.Why not look into making this available in all the usual formats – pdf/epub/mobi – and maybe selling it as a download via paypal for, say, four quid. (Have the price of the hard copy + postage.)I would say the same for all the recent pamphlets that have been produced or reprinted.

Viewing 15 posts - 376 through 390 (of 824 total)