ComradeEmma

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #214580
    ComradeEmma
    Participant

    I have no doubt that there actually were a pedophile “movement”, there was such “movements” in multiple European countries, though I doubt how large they actually were in real life out of the sect left or the small groups they broke from. What I took issue with is that you are trying to tie it to the “trans lobby”(whatever that actually is) while the wikipeida you link just links the organisation to homosexuality-right and gay separatist groups. That doesn’t mean that one should accuse homosexual-rights groups in general of being pedophiles, like the right-wing still often does.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 4 months ago by ComradeEmma.
    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #214558
    ComradeEmma
    Participant

    “I guess” is doing a lot of carrying here in this comment, Jordan! I honestly don’t know how you ever expected an actual debate here when you keep just tacking on new things without anything to back it up.

    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #214400
    ComradeEmma
    Participant

    You are evading explaining the retweet. You evading explaining why you are supporting reactionary politicians on social media is by any measure worse than me supposedly evading explaining what a woman is.

    • This reply was modified 1 year, 4 months ago by ComradeEmma.
    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #214398
    ComradeEmma
    Participant

    I am not going to debate you on this, you and your ilk are very predictable(on top of you making up new categories like “self-ID”). I am not trying to debate you on that, and I don’t know why a male who claims to understand radical feminism feels he is a position to be so authoritative on how the debate should be carried out. It seems you are taking the aesthetics of radical feminism but forgetting the actual practice that made second wave feminism into the force that it was. The reason I think your politics are incoherent is because you retweeted an extremely reactionary politician who’s conception of “women’s rights” probably doesn’t include reproductive rights. Do you really think the amendment to the Equality act that the Republican opposed is going to remove the word women?

    I have no doubt that the SPGB/WSM has a better line on this, the article that was posted by the official SPGB in the twitter thread was very reasonable.

    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #214360
    ComradeEmma
    Participant

    Regardless of that, is being a socialist and an “impossiblist” really compatible with upholding the most reactionary and backwards of politicians for their opposition to trans people?

    in reply to: WSPUS and Transgender #214352
    ComradeEmma
    Participant

    He has stated on Facebook and Twitter that he is a member of the World Socialist Party of the United States. Even as an outsider he doesn’t seem to have a coherent set of politics. He also retweeted this tweet from a Republican senator with ties to Qanon: https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1364719403498164226

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)