ALB
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
A reformist Social Democratic Party. Seen that. It’s the past and it doesn’t work.
In America the word “socialism” has come to mean government ownership and control of the economy — a misconception we have spent the last century trying to combat. The only saving grace of this is that in bringing the word into prominence it gives us a foot in the door to say what socialism really means.
“they should have locked all the vulnerable away and had measles parties for the under 60’s with no underlying medical conditions.”
I was going to suggest that that was the logic of the Swedish professor’s position but thought that might be going too far. But, now you have raised it, why don’t you set out to deliberately catch it. That would be a noble contribution — perhaps even sacrifice — to help achieve herd immunity.
If they don’t find an effective vaccine the only way to overcome it will be the herd becoming immune, which implies that many will die. It would just be a question of when: sooner or later ?
It seems that the government’s policy here is in effect to try to delay the spread until a vaccine is found. That way less people can be expected to die.
The Swedish government (and the government here originally) seems to be taking the view that you might as well get the deaths that will occur to get herd immunity over sooner rather than later.
That Swedish professor says that only the frail and elderly should be protected from catching it. Fair enough but the implication is that those of working age should not be protected. Maybe for some the effects of catching it will be relatively mild but clearly not for everyone. Some will die. Already there is talk based on some evidence that the age limit for the those more vulnerable should be reduced from 70 to 65 even 60.
Anyway in Sweden unless you area elderly or frail, it’s “may the most resistant survive”. Hard luck if you are not and don’t. It might work I suppose but.
Actually, Sweden has a track record in allowing mad professors free rein:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/sweden-admits-to-racial-purification-1247261.html%3famp
Come to think of it, consciously pursuing a policy of herd immunity can be seen as a form of eugenics, the survival of the fittest and the elimination of the weakest.
Yes it does seem that Sweden’s chief epidemiologist may be a bit of a Mad Professor carrying out an experiment on people. According to yesterday’s Times:
”Dr Tegnell suggested last week that Stockholm could achieve herd immunity, where a large enough majority of the population have recovered from the disease that the virus has little room to spread, within weeks. Most scientists estimate that this requires at least 60 per cent of people to become infected.”
That’s a lot of people and of course the more people are infected the more will die. Anyway. is the population of Stockholm large enough or isolated enough to constitute a herd?
We will see. The difference between scenarios about the pandemic and those about climate change is that for the pandemic we don’t have to wait until 2100 to see how accurate or inaccurate they are. We can known within weeks. So, we will be able to see fairly soon whether Dr Tegnell is a mad professor or not.
Not too bad. But this struck me. Can somebody quote chapter and verse on it?
”The “war of the masks” as media call it, is an edifying example of this. Each state is grabbing the material it can through speculation, bidding wars, and even out-and-out theft. The US has been nabbing planeloads of Chinese masks promised to France. France has confiscated cargoes of masks heading by air for Sweden. The Czech Republic has seized at its customs barriers ventilators and masks destined for Italy. Germany has made masks heading for Canada disappear.”
Quite believable of course. I wonder whether this is the cause of the delay in the famous air shipment of protective equipment from Turkey. Is the capitalist business selling them trying to extract a higher price? Are they threatening to sell them to a higher bidder? That would be normal capitalist behaviour.
It is this but I don’t suppose you’ll be able to see it as it’s an old Yahoo group that now only members can see.
So, another amateur epidemiologist that doesn’t know what he’s talking about. That’s what I suspected.
Don’t know if this relevant to the discussion but someone has posted this on a left-communist discussion forum I’m on. I don’t know what the point he is trying to make is; it seems to be that “shelter” (isolation) doesn’t make that much difference.
A friend of mine decided to do some number crunching on COVID-19. Here are here results. – JeffAs of today’s figures 4/16, here are COVID-19 deaths per capita for several European countries:
Belgium 0.0419%
Spain 0.0413%
Italy 0.0366%
UK 0.0202%
Netherlands 0.0194%
Switzerland 0.0149%
Sweden 0.0132%
Denmark 0.0055%
Germany 0.0048%
Austria 0.0046%
Norway 0.0028%
Finland 0.0014%So, assuming all other countries had strong shelter in place rules, note that there are at least 6 countries in Europe that have a higher COVID-19 mortality per capita than Sweden, even though they have shelter in place.
As for the states, I usually collate this info every Monday. So as of Monday 4/13, the following 5 states in the US had a higher COVID-19 mortality per capita than Sweden. I believe they all have strong shelter in place rules:
New York 0.0481%
New Jersey 0.0264%
Louisiana 0.0183%
Michigan 0.0139%
Connecticut 0.0137%BTW, As of 4/13, California’s COVID-19 deaths per capita was 0.0016%, ranking 30 out of the 50 states+DC.
Sources, and additional comments.
COVID-19 deaths: https://ncov2019.live/dataEmail received from Andrew Whitehead, former BBC radio journalist:
I now have a page of my website devoted to Harry Young, including the audio of two long interviews I did with him and of two radio programmes in which I had no role but which featured Harry.This material posted is almost all about his CPGB days. There are a few mentions of the SPGB. I hope it may be of interest to you and your colleagues.More on Bogdanov here:
Meet the new shadow Business Secretary : Ed Miliband, avowed supporter of capitalism.
Trying to make capitalism nicer is the most the Labour Party has always ever aspired to do but, when in office, has always failed to deliver as it’s undeliverable.
There is also this that we said in 1932:
The Programme of the Russian Mensheviks and Social Revolutionaries
Speculation about what the Mensheviks would have done if they, not the Bolsheviks, had ruled Russia is pretty idle as they had even less support amongst the general population than did the Bolsheviks and unlike the Bolsheviks were not prepared to be a minority dictatorship. If the results of the elections to the Constituent Assembly in 1918 were anything to go by, if the Bolsheviks hadn’t seized power (and the White Russians hadn’t restored the Tsar or established a military dictatorship) Russian parliamentary politics and government would have been dominated by various parties representing the peasants. The biggest party to emerge from those elections was the non-Marxist Socialist Revolutionary Party.
Actually of course Von Mises wrote it in German (in 1920) so the term “commonwealth” is that of the person who first translated it into English in 1935. The German word that Von Mises used was “Gemeinwesen” which doesn’t have to be translated as “commonwealth”. So maybe the translator had read up on genuine socialist literature. Anyway he kept the term “Socialist Commonwealth” in circulation.
I see the homeopaths are trying to cash in on the Coronavirus pandemic. But as today’s Times points out:
”Over recent decades the Prince of Wakes has consistently campaigned for homeopathic treatments. However, The Times understands that he did not receive homeopathic treatment when he contracted the virus.”
He’s not that stupid. Incidentally it’s not just him but the whole royal family who believe in this fake remedy. It’s part of their German heritage.
