ALB
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
London branch is holding a street stall outside Herne Hill station from 12.30 today for a couple of Hours.
They seem to be saying that it is language as the basis of abstract thinking (ie thinking about something in its absence):
“… the authors of the present study propose that human culture is distinctive for its “open-endedness.” In contrast to all other animals, humans have the ability to learn and execute complex sequences of steps to accomplish an ultimate goal. These steps or subgoals are “modular” in the sense that they can be employed individually to accomplish a number of different tasks. Furthermore, they can be creatively recombined in novel sequences to meet new needs.
This is evident, for example, with respect to language, which can be employed very fluidly to accommodate and adapt to a wide range of factors. Though the authors do not specifically refer to this, the basis of this flexibility lies in the nature of language itself, that is, the mechanism of thought by which actions and phenomena in the external world are abstracted into mental symbols or ideas. This allows ideas to be manipulated and applied in new ways to situations distinct from those from which they were originally derived, in the same way as words can be combined to make new sentences which in turn can be combined into novel paragraphs, and so to express things that did not previously exist.”
Another letter from us in this week’s Weekly Worker. A reply to Andrew Northall about what happens if you have a programme of reforms to be implemented under capitalism:
This person, who also died recently, seems a much more interesting Trotskyoid:
She was a member of the old POUM Party in Spain.
Unfortunately this is behind a paywall But there’s this in Spanish:
https://vientosur.info/maria-teresa-carbonell-1926-2025/
and this in Catalan:
https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Teresa_Carbonell_i_Cornejo
“Theoretician”, “Workers’ Leader”. He was neither, just a common or garden manipulative Trotskyist political operator. And not a very clever one. He oversaw Militant’s brazen attempt in 1997 to steal one of the names we’d been using for over 90 years. But didn’t realise that “Socialist Party of England and Wales” gave, appropriately enough, SPEW as the acronym.
Two of us leafletted a protest demonstration outside Lambeth Town Hall this evening. It was against the Labour-controlled council’s decision to have recourse to no-fault evictions (even though the government has said it is going abolish this). About 30 people there including the Green Party candidate (who spoke to express solidarity) and Green councillor Scott Ainslie. The SWP had a stall. No sign of TUSC/SPEW and their candidate.
Earlier, while distributing leaflets in the ward, we came across the LibDem candidate’s leaflet. It makes one good point:
“Labour ministers cut benefits because they say they can’t be afforded. But then ministers admit they are looking at reducing UK taxes on big US tech companies — because Donald Trump has demanded it.”
No mention of the fact that the Tory-LibDem coalition government in office 2010-2015 also cut benefits — to reduce the burden of taxation on profits in a failed bid to get the profit-driven, capitalist economy expanding again after the Crash of 2008.
As the popular saying has it: Labour, Liberal, Tory, Same Old Boring Story.
Here is an election statement from our reformist, state-capitalist opponent in Herne Hill and Loughborough Junction:
https://whocanivotefor.co.uk/person/119341/marco-tesei
He doesn’t mention socialism (which is good) but he does claim to be a member of the Socialist Party (which isn’t).
More, from their South London facebook page, of the intervention of Stand Up To Racism in the Herne Hill and Loughborough Junction by-election. Stalls outside both Herne Hill and Loughborough Junction stations.
https://www.facebook.com/SouthLondonSUTR/?locale=en_GB
The older man in the middle of the photo of them all not carrying a placard is the Green Party councillor Scott Ainslie. Presumably he wants people not just to not vote for ReformUK but to vote for his party.
The TUSC candidate in another council by-election, in north London, was not happy with their intervention there:
“Rather than campaigning for a socialist candidate, Stand up to Racism distributed a leaflet simply calling for people ‘not to vote for Reform’, not offering a political alternative to Labour austerity.”
(https://www.socialistparty.org.uk/articles/137874/16-04-2025/labour-collapse-and-socialist-challenge-in-london-by-election/)He has a point. It is all very well saying in an election don’t vote for a particular candidate but, if you don’t want them to be elected, from your own point of view you should offer an alternative candidate to vote for, for instance the candidate most likely to beat them. Councillor Ainslie understood that.
More leaflets distributed yesterday in Herne Hill and Loughborough Junction ward. We met the Conservative Party candidate and his canvassers. No sign of the LibDem, Reform or even TUSC.
In fact we’ve nearly finished but will probably have to leave out the mansions at the top of the hill with long drives and two or three 4x4s parked at the end.
Capitalists have to live somewhere and some seem to in Herne Hill (but not Loughborough Junction):
Here’s one promise that the Labour government will honour. It’s to the capitalist class.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/04/19/chancellor-rachel-reeves-vows-to-avoid-wealth-tax/
Andrew Northall is now a member of the CPB (the Morning Star mob). He is being unfair to McNair who has specifically criticised us and repudiated our position. But it is revealing that “you are like the SPGB” should be being used as an insult. Actually of course it’s a sort of compliment to us.
Another letter from us published in yesterday’s Weekly Worker. It’s the second one down.
https://www.weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/1534/letters/
To be fair, despite being Leninists, they do open their letters page to all-comers.
Missed this second reference to us in last week’s Weekly Worker:
“However, the danger is that the negative dialectic induces the TAS comrades, in attempting to avoid the danger of insufficient political/moral distance from Stalinists, to take the position of the Socialist Party of Great Britain – nothing happens now except propaganda for socialism, until billions agree – then you can introduce full communism on a world scale.”
In this article:
https://www.weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/1533/unity-in-three-parts/
Clearly the WW people are trying to press home their perceived advantage in being able to accuse the other side with SPGBism.
Here are details of our TUSC opponent and his reformist programme. Just a far-fetched proposal that the council defy the government on spending which, when it gets nowhere (except to the councillors being surcharged and the government sending in a commissioner to run the council), SPEW hope will lead those who fall for it to turn to them for leadership in a bid to overthrow the capitalist state (and establish a state capitalist regime). In other words, a typical manipulative Trotskyist “transitional demand”. Or perhaps he is naive enough to believe that what he proposes is realistic.
https://whocanivotefor.co.uk/person/119341/marco-tesei
Here’s is the information the same site provides on our candidate:
More leaflets distributed today in Herne Hill and Loughborough Junction. More Green Party window posters spotted. Also, the SWP, in the form of Stand Up to Racism, has made an intervention in the election, putting a leaflet through letter boxes in Railton Road saying “Reform UK is a racist party. Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party is a danger to us all. Don’t vote for it”. Which is more than Reform UK is doing. Not their territory really.
