November 2, 2020 at 5:06 pm #208822J SurmanParticipant
No doubt some of you already know this – I found it a good read.November 2, 2020 at 8:16 pm #208825
Yes, it’s good. Sort of reviewed in the April 2005 Socialist Standard:November 3, 2020 at 5:00 am #208834alanjjohnstoneKeymaster
The American SLP wrote to Einstein. Don’t know if he repliedNovember 3, 2020 at 8:29 am #208840
Unfortunately, it didn’t take long for Einstein to go off the rails, as this snippet from the December 1950 Socialist Standard “Sense and Nonsense” column shows:
Einstein out of his Depth
“The intelligence and character of the masses are unquestionably lower than the intelligence and character of the few who produce something valuable for the community.”
“We should not make the mistake of blaming Capitalism for all existing social and political evils. . . . Socialism . . . might more easily lead to wars than Capitalism because it represents a still greater concentration of power.”
(From “Out of my Later Years” by Albert Einstein, Quoted in Daily Mail, 13/11/50.)November 3, 2020 at 9:53 am #208843
More on Einstein and Socialism from the January 1931 Socialist Standard. The article hints that he was a supporter of the Labour Party which was then in government:November 3, 2020 at 12:35 pm #208846J SurmanParticipant
Yes, thanks for the extra context ALB. Unfortunately too many people expect too much from those they see as at a ‘higher level’ in some area or another – because they are an ‘expert’ at something, whatever it is, they are expected to say the right thing about whatever they are writing or discussing, forgetting that they are also just people with their own – maybe skewed – ideas and opinions.November 3, 2020 at 1:38 pm #208848LBirdParticipant
Einstein (quoted by ALB) “The intelligence and character of the masses are unquestionably lower than the intelligence and character of the few who produce something valuable for the community.”
Yes, Einstein was a bog-standard ‘materialist’ (as Marx pointed out their key political trait in his Theses on Feuerbach), who later rejected his own work in physics, because his theory of relativity undermined ‘materialism’, as many other physicists soon realised.
Our political choice in physics is either ‘elite knowledge’ or ‘democratic epistemology’.
All ‘materialists’, without fail, choose ‘elite knowledge’. Like Einstein, given a choice between ‘mass activity’ or ‘elite reflection’, when determining ‘truth’ in ‘nature’, the ‘materialists’ will choose ‘elite reflection’.
Marx pointed this out in 1845.
Bourgeois physics caught up in 1915.
‘Materialists’ in 2020? Still faithful to the elite.
- This reply was modified 3 years, 1 month ago by LBird.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.