Trump as president again?
- This topic has 334 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 1 month, 1 week ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Except that Europe will attack Russia because they know that will bring the US, which is a nuclear power, in on their side.
I understand that we, as workers, should not take sides in capitalist disputes and that we want peace, since we are the ones who die in their wars. But if the United States attacks Venezuela, do they have to defend themselves or not?
I agree with the SPGB that workers should not take sides in capitalist disputes and that our interest lies in peace, since it is always workers who die in their wars. Both the United States and Venezuela are capitalist states, and any conflict between them would be a clash of ruling classes, not a struggle for our emancipation.
At the same time, it is clear that if a military attack were to take place, workers in the country under attack would be compelled to defend themselves, not out of choice but out of necessity. This, however, does not turn national defense into a progressive cause. It remains a defense of a capitalist state, not of the working class as such.
From a socialist point of view, the task of workers is not to choose between aggressor and victim among capitalist powers, but to oppose all forms of nationalism and militarism, and to maintain international working-class solidarity. Supporting one state against another only reinforces the system that produces war in the first place.
Therefore, while we can recognize the reality of aggression and the human suffering it entails, we should not politically support any capitalist government or war effort. The only consistent position is class against class, and the struggle for a world beyond capitalism, where such wars would no longer arise.
And chances are it is the government of the state workers inhabit that becomes the foremost oppressor, hunting conscientious objectors, forceable enlistment against our will, silencing anti-war protest, etc. Resistence to the invader will inflame his forces against the workers of the invaded country and bring reprisals.
We must support, for instance, the necessarily violent resistence of the inmates of places like Treblinka, but at the same time NOT support the Allied military powers in their killing of innocent workers for capitalist interests.
If one reads Hannah Arendt we see that violent resistence against the Nazis stopped no atrocities. In fact, it invited them. So did sabotage and individual acts. However, what did upset and even render impossible Nazi policy was the mass industrial strike. This took place in Denmark against the seizing of Jews. The Nazis were in the end only able to take a handful of Danish Jews who surrendered themselves. The mass workers’ strike flummoxed the Wehrmacht and it in turn went on strike. The SS troops sent to threaten the Wehrmacht also went on strike. Jew-seizing was stopped. As long as working class action was mass action, it proved stronger than Nazi power and succeeded where violence failed.
https://fee.org/articles/how-denmark-fought-the-nazi-terror/
Internationalist Perspective
DECEMBER 24, 2025 BY INTERNATIONALIST PERSPECTIVE
TEN QUESTIONS ON THE POLICIES OF THE TRUMP GOVERNMENT
The German language blog Communaut asked IP’s Sanderr to answer ten questions about the Trump administration’s policies. He did, with some help of other US-based IP members.And the US government and the Cubans for Trump were complaining about Cuba. Three dollars meal for the US workers, some poor people around the world are living on one or two dollars a day
“Scale and speed of president’s moves have stunned observers of authoritarian regimes – is the US in democratic peril?”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/21/trump-american-democracy
This is quite an interesting commentary that I came across. Has the Trump regime reached a tipping point after the murderous antics of his ICE thugs? The popularity of the regime was already in decline but does this latest cock-up finally spell the end of the regime or any hope of re-election in the next few years?
Multiple videos of the incident were out in the public and everyone was able to see that what really had happened were crimes committed by multiple ICE agents. Every newspaper and channel which discussed the video called out the lies by the Trump administration.
The false narrative coming from the White House turned out be a huge own-goal. It has become a complete unnecessary public relation disaster for the Trump administration.
It was why I asked Why Is Trump Causing His Own Downfall?
The system doesn’t collapse because of bad leaders. It produces bad leaders because that’s what the job requires.
Different clown, same circus.We are not talking about collapse, we are talking about the decline in popularity and the decline of world hegemony, others empire are also challenging the US. England signed an agreement with Mercosur, and Canada signed an agreement with China; both empires are intervening in the spheres of influence of the US. There is a new realignment of alliances among the capitalists. It has been proven that the collapsist and the subconsumist theories are wrong
I am not arguing that capitalism will collapse by itself. I am fully aware that only the conscious political action of the working class can bring about systemic change.
What I was referring to is something different: the decline of US global dominance and the reconfiguration of alliances among capitalist states. These are not signs of capitalism’s collapse, but normal features of a system based on competition between rival blocs of capital.
We are clearly witnessing shifts in power: • New trade agreements that bypass traditional US influence
• Greater autonomy among former allies
• Increasing rivalry between capitalist powers
• Realignment of geopolitical interests
This does not mean the system is ending. It means the terrain of capitalist competition is changing.
At the same time, changing political leaders within this framework does not alter the fundamentals. Whoever governs must manage the same economic imperatives: profitability, competitiveness, labour discipline, and state power. That is why swapping politicians does not equal real change.
Collapse theories fail because capitalism adapts. Reformist theories fail because adaptation is not emancipation.
The conclusion is simple: Capitalism will not fall on its own, and it will not be voted out by changing personalities. Only conscious, organised action by the working class can replace it.I repeat again, I am talkig about collapse, declining is not the same as collapse, England lost its sphere of influences after world war 2 but it did not collapse
https://www.gregpalast.com/gen-z-divorces-maga/.
Maga is abandoning Trump for the same reasons that they voted against Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Latinos for Trump are also leaving the movement, including the Cubans and Venezuelans, Asians, and Afro Americans are also leaving the movement
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.