TrueScotsman
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
“The failure for whatever the reason of Russia to capture Kiev was a key moment.”
You can not fail at something you never attempted All-in with the CIA. The Russian troops outside Kiev were there to pin down Ukrainian soldiers stationed there in order to prevent them reinforcing the east. The Kremlin subsequently withdrew them after the battlefield had been shaped and as a gesture of goodwill during peace negotiations.
“And no you won’t ever have the pleasure of ever rubbing my nose in it when the outcome of this stupid war is settled. Unlike you, I am a socialist and support neither side.”
I’ll enjoy rubbing your nose in it for the simple satisfaction of me being better informed than you and therefore right. If you’re wrong about this, and you are and will be proven to be, what else are you wrong about? You see where this leads?
“I don’t think the DSM-5 is often used as a basis for fashion magazine articles.
But the arrogant dismissal of other’s concerns IS another common symptom, you might want to read up on it.”
Come on, it was either Tween Vogue or Girls’ Life. Which was it?
“Oh, so no explanation from you as to why you think the Ukrainian capture of Kherson is a striking example of how the Ukrainian regime is “decisively losing the war”.”
Robotomy, I try to avoid commenting on the war until I’ve listened to analysis from those with military expertise or who have analysed what such people say. And, having done so, it seems clear that this was an orderly Russian retreat with no loss of life. Therefore, merely a tactical setback in one section of a hugely sprawling battlefield. The Russians have had plenty of them but the overall picture has always remained the same. They’re winning decisively.
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2022/11/the-pullout-from-kherson.html#comments
“Don’t let the egg on your face deter you”
Robotomy, there’s no egg on my face you credulous dupe. Ukraine is losing decisively, and even a smooth brained Guardian Brah such as yourself will soon have to face the truth. I look forward to rubbing your nose in it.
“The basic rule with regards to TS is that if the citation supports him it is authentic, unbiased and correct, if it does’nt support him it is biased, written by the CIA, inauthentic and right wing.”
Erm, no. I support the truth. All my assertions re the agency, or anything else for that matter, are supported with copious evidence.
Bojo’s Brain, I suppose you think the billions spent on the CIA’s budget only goes to buying office supplies? Can you actually be that dim? Is it possible?
“I think he has at least 5 of the following characteristics”
Lol, where’d you learn psychology, in a tween fashion magazine? Spare us the pablum. Bojo’s Brain, you’re not a serious person.
“Now it’s safe to say the Ukrainians actively are winning the war”
LOL, Robotomy, you are funny. Since we’re in fantasy land…unicorns are real, drink from bubblegum lakes and fart rainbows.
“Now the question is, was the information provided about Lancaster and Mintpress from Wikipedia made-up lies when supported by other sources? Can you refute what is said with counter-evidence?”
Prove that liars are liars? Lol, you’re a joker All-in with the CIA.
“The students did not want to go to Russia to continue their education, because Russia was not going to accept their academic credentials”
You got any evidence for all your claims?
“Have you ever bothered to read how Wiki entries are discussed and agreed and edited?
Is there political bias? Yes. Is it only from the CIA?”
As a matter of fact All-in (with the bourgeoisie), self confessed friend of the CIA, (he won’t deny saying it!) I have. Have you?
Phillip Cross: The Mystery Wikipedia Editor Targeting Anti-War Sites
Wikipedia formally censors The Grayzone as regime-change advocates monopolize editing
“Perhaps this other website report quoting journalists who have worked with Lancaster can be considered corroborating evidence of his unreliability.”
Platforming smear pieces of independent journalists now are we All-in with the bourgeoisie? There are no depths All-in is not prepared to debase himself in order to carry the imperialists’ piss water. Next he’ll be throwing Julian Assange under the bus.
“David Ferris, a hack filmmaker and writer”
There, fixed it for you.
“As for Mintpress News, itself scarcely a neutral objective news agency.”
Lol. Name a “neutral” journalist or news site. But at least it’s left-wing and independent.
“I had always thought that the relatively peaceful transition to the traditional ‘bourgeois’ rule was due to the widespread contempt for the ruling ‘nomenklatura’ and their lies by the people? Not that it really matters since”
Weazel, why are you surprised that you’re wrong? That’s the rule not the exception as far as you and the Socialist Posers Guardian Bros are concerned.
“Vice website itself has a bias but is its reporting on this accurate?”
Lol, Vice. Hipster neo-con, Murdoch lackeys. I think I’ll start calling you “All-in” now Alan as you’re All-in with the bourgeois narrative producers. Bravo!
VICE’s Fall From Counterculture Hipster Rag To Neoliberal Government Mouthpiece
