admice

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 131 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Again hope u r OK #99379
    admice
    Participant

    good point. But there are pockets of safety…unless one quarter of the state falls in the ocean.

    in reply to: 100% reserve banking #86851
    admice
    Participant

    Meant to post this awhile ago. Pretty good simple explanations of finance. Sorry if youve already posted similar in this long thread.http://www.peakprosperity.com/crashcourse

    in reply to: Alternatives to Christmas? #99288
    admice
    Participant

    Winter Solstice. Went to 1 freethinker party last week, one coming up.

    in reply to: discussion of dissenting opinions #99232
    admice
    Participant

    K, this is the main reason I can't be a conventional socialist, they use words like this:  Substitutionist. You all have more 'ists' and 'isms' than I have ever encountered before.

    in reply to: English – the world language #99280
    admice
    Participant

    Well, you British and Australian English speakers don't speak real English anyway.

    in reply to: first capitalists #99254
    admice
    Participant

    here's a link to the Brenner debate  http://www-personal.umd.umich.edu/~delittle/brenner.htmwikipedia seems to have less spin on the subject

    in reply to: discussion of dissenting opinions #99228
    admice
    Participant

    Good, yay. You had your oopportunity to get rid of me, too bad you didn't take it   :)

    in reply to: Break-in at No.52 #92495
    admice
    Participant

    Does this commonly happen to political organizations there?

    in reply to: first capitalists #99253
    admice
    Participant

    Thanks for all the info. It's a good thing I'm a fast reader.

    in reply to: Winning the world? #99268
    admice
    Participant

    Society has a base and superstructure, even the insanity that is Capitalism." Please clarify or provide links elaborating on this phrase.

    in reply to: discussion of dissenting opinions #99226
    admice
    Participant

    I mostly meant like me, a non-member (but partial supporter).Also on the WSM forum some member mentioned it is for promoting your platform (I can't re-find the post) when I asked there, so I thought you don't want conflicting ideas, though you have been tolerant of mine. thanks

    in reply to: Weekly Worker 990 #99241
    admice
    Participant

    "Direct action to prevent free speech is as bad as state legislation to do this.""The events on Tuesday were a disgrace and discredit to socialism and a blow for fascism" Well said. This goes much deeper though. It's one thing to counter or prevent violence with violence, what was done there was a whole different issue. Supports so many criticisms of socialism: democracy, human nature, anarchy, violence. Too many to go into now.Why do I keep coming to the conclusion people are idiots.

    in reply to: Weekly Worker 990 #99237
    admice
    Participant

    Sort of a digression. Regarding the table toppling, why did they attack another socialist group? Only or primarily because of the rape allegations?

    in reply to: Free eBooks #99243
    admice
    Participant

    I've been subscribed free to http://www.free-ebooks.net/  for a few months, but have only read 1 of their books.btw I noticed Gutenberg  was missing Das Capital. I'm suspecting they are selective in what they produce.

    in reply to: discussion of dissenting opinions #99222
    admice
    Participant

    Yes, I've been posting here, as you know, but I'm in USA so 'officially or technically' (can you tell I'm obsessive) I shouldn't post here. "The really fruitful discussions of dissenting opinions are probably post-branch meetings when members re-locate to a local licensed hostelry to refresh themselves with an alcoholic beverage or few and indulge in some reflection and criticism — in vino veritas, as they say".Dang, I'm really missing out :(Thanks (and dam you alanjjohnstone, lol)

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 131 total)