Top 10 viewed articles for 2014
- This topic has 30 replies, 11 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
1. France's Bourgeois Revolution
2. The Political Ideas of George Orwell
3. What is Capitalism?
4. Marx and Lenin's Views Contrasted
5. The Rise of Capitalism
6. Is a Third World War Inevitable?
http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/pamphlets/third-world-war-inevitable
7. Study Guide – The Russian Revolution and Bolshevik Dictatorship and Labour Theory of Value
8. Marx and Socialism a Critical Evaluation
9. Marx's Basic Theory
10. Marxism Vs Leninism
DJP wrote:22,549 for top one. 6249 for bottom. 744,374 for whole site.Does the figure of 744,374 include visits to the forum?
gnome wrote:Does the figure of 744,374 include visits to the forum?Yes, but excludes repeat visits to individual pages and visits by spambots. Including repeat visits to pages the total is 982,752 made by 366,696 users. The most popular forum thread was the "Science for Communists" one but that's at around 100 in the charts…
DJP wrote:[The most popular forum thread was the "Science for Communists" one but that's at around 100 in the charts…What happened to him, anyway?
ALB wrote:DJP wrote:[The most popular forum thread was the "Science for Communists" one but that's at around 100 in the charts…What happened to him, anyway?
I was banned, for the second time.That's right, readers, the originator and the most compelling, erudite and understandable contributor, to the most popular thread of 2014 on the SPGB forums, was banned.Not a great advert for the liberties we can expect under 'SPGB Socialism', I fear.But…. I'm back!However, I suppose it will be "three strikes and out", eh?I was thinking of starting a new thread, entitled 'Mathematics for Communists', with the same critical approach that the SPGB apparently disapproves of, but I can hear the howls even now, from the 'objectivists' of 'mudpie-ism' ('Engelsian Materialism', for the uninitiated in these arcane debates):"He's ruined physics for us, and now he intends to slur mathematics, too! He's bound to say mathematics should be under the democratic control of the workers, too, the bastard! Is there no end to this betraying of the objective world, the static reality, the uncriticisable nature of the physical world?"Well, all I can say, comrades, is:"Not according to the relativist Karl Marx, and his theories about 'Modes of Production', that our human understanding of both physics and mathematics (amongst everything else) is related to our social production".Shall we go for 'third strike maths', comrades?
Welcome back LBIRD, (I'll try and sneak this one past the Mod. ….. well it is the season of good will)I like the well timed flamboyant entrance, a bit like this, I feel.https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=rick%20mayall's%20flashman
that went off like a damp squib. Try this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKfbSHW9uGA
alanjjohnstone wrote:2+2=5Nah, 2+2=11,alan!In base 3.One has to know the 'hard core' assumptions one is making, whether in physics, maths or politics.2+2=4 ONLY IF ONE ASSUMES BASE 10.Similarly, a rock is 'hard' only if one assumes human consciousness. The judgment of 'hard' requires both external world and mind, and the method of theory and practice.Ahhh… it's so good to be back!
northern light wrote:Welcome back LBIRD, (I'll try and sneak this one past the Mod. ….. well it is the season of good will)I like the well timed flamboyant entrance, a bit like this, I feel.https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=rick%20mayall's%20flashmanYeah, he was an irritating bugger as well, lol
northern light wrote:Welcome back LBIRD, (I'll try and sneak this one past the Mod. ….. well it is the season of good will)I like the well timed flamboyant entrance, a bit like this, I feel.https://www.google.co.uk/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=rick%20mayall's%20flashmanWell, I hear Lord Flashheart is worshipping me, now!Thanks for the welcome.As for 'flamboyance', whatever do you mean? I'm giving the Puritan, staid, honest-to-goodness, objective truth, just like the 'materialists' and their "God's Truth", that matter itself whispers into the ears of the believers alone.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.