[Rednose Blew]

Challenge: Toss aside the well-worn and as-taught ideologies of the so-called masters and create a contemporary structure that best represents all, and would bring the best in us all out.It is impossible to include labels such as Marxism without including the baggage of misinterpretation. It's like talking about God or the Bible: Mere reference to them conjures unwanted images that permeate any argument and negates useful debate that might secure the baby while throwing out the bathwater. It's time to accept this fact, and put such references behind us. I'm both fatigued, yet constantly shocked, to see all new models judged within these archaic and narrow frameworks…boxes ticked in accordance with some pre-existing dogma that no longer serves us in our current circumstances. Why do we need to define ideology? Just create your system, and let others label it. If we are also asking about the meaning of the original communist theory centuries after its true application became obsolete, then it's clear that it has been hi-jacked, and not by chance. All good tenet labels of any threat are muddied with the sole purpose of ensuring that they are associated with negative tenets. Stay ahead of the hi-jackers and change the label. Be original. Be relevant.Shall we spend our allotted time fighting to restore the original meanings of systems past, or shall we take that which we know to be relevant to today from those systems, and create something that is actually workable and sustainable TODAY – then give it a new name before the box-fitters and hi-jackers squeeze it into a label drawn from their narrow conditioning curricula? 

[Author]

Posts