imposs1904
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I think this post from Richard Seymour on his popular blog, Lenin's Tomb:http://www.leninology.com/2013/01/crisis-in-swp.htmland China Mielville's quotes in Laurie Penny's New Statesman article about the events in the SWP:http://www.newstatesman.com/laurie-penny/2013/01/what-does-swps-way-dealing-sex-assault-allegations-tell-us-about-left is pretty much a game changer for the SWP. I'd be genuinely surprised if this time next year the SWP resembles the organisation it currently is, the organisation it has been for the last forty plus years. It's the most serious schism in the IS/SWP tradition since the IS Opposition split in the mid-seventies. I don't think it was this recent sad chain of events that prompted some members of the SWP to look at its democratic deficit. It took the internet. It wouldn't have happened otherwise.
Another review of Gluckstein's book by a fellow SWPer:http://resolutereader.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/donny-gluckstein-peoples-history-of.html
An article on Morris from the same author that appeared in an old issue of the ISJ along the same lines as the book: http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/isj2/1996/isj2-071/mahamdallie.htm
We should be looking to convert pamphlets – both old and new – into epub and mobi formats and placing them on the Party website for free download.
Hopefully the 80s generation of Party members who are now either detached or semi-detached from the SPGB will be contacted about this.
Seems strange (and a little sad) to read that Woodward sought to distort our position, 'cos I remember he was actually a guest speaker at a Central London Branch meeting in the early 2000s. (Sorry, I can't remember the exact year, though the meeting would probably have been advertised in the Standard at the time.)The invite to speak at the branch came about because a couple of us got chatting to him at the SWP's Marxism that year – we may have had adjacent stalls outside the event – and we were interested in his political history and political trajectory, I guess. Someone who was in the IS/SWP position for 35 plus years and then decides on his own special take on councillism is not something you encounter every day.I don't remember much about the meeting itself, except that the ICC turned up mob-handed (all 3 of them) and proceeded to denounce him in the gentlest of terms during the question and discussion period. ;-)It turns out that his pamphlets had turned up on their radar at the time, and they thought it needed the extra effort to speak out in public against him.He seemed like a nice enough bloke at the time.
“I wouldn’t be surprised if he ends up a bishop.” I knew there was a method to my madness when I lent him my copy of Tariq Ali’s Redemption.
Ed wrote:is there any more of that peoples century video? It looked like Harry Young had more to say on the subject.That’s the full clip of Harry Young from that programme. I know this because it was me who uploaded the clip to YouTube. ;-)Btw, as a point of interest, the consultant for that particular episode of People’s Century was Robert Service, who’s best known for his biographies of Lenin and Trotsky. I think a couple of his books have been reviewed in the Standard.
ALB wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqlXbJOpYiIFor newer members, the Party speaker is Harry Young.Look at the Standards they are selling in the clip. That’s later than ’82. Maybe ’86 or ’87. I left a comment to that effect on the YouTube page and the cheeky sod deleted it.
ALB wrote:Here is a video interview the on-line London magazine, the Big Smoke, did with Daniel Lambert, our candidate in Lambeth & Southwark. Technical difficulties prevented them putting it up earlier, but better late than never.http://www.bigsmoke.org.uk/?p=77382I see the video got reposted on the I Acknowledge The Class War Exists Facebook Page. That’s a big deal. To use the jargon, it has eighty thousand ‘likes
jondwhite wrote:From that list I’d recommend Bulgakov and Zamyatin. I hated Jack London’s Iron Heel when I read it many, many years ago but it was just after I’d read Robert Barltrop’s biography of London, and no doubt my opinion was coloured by Barltrop disclosure that London was a racist.I’ll probably read it again one of these days.
