DJP

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 2,238 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • DJP
    Participant

    Haven't looked at the Hudis one. The Buick and Crump book can be downloaded for free from libcom too:http://libcom.org/library/alternative-capitalism

    DJP
    Participant

    This is happening tomorrow so here are some better directions to the venue. Ignore the map provided by Facebook, it's wrong. Swan Lane is between London Street and Bedford Street. The venue is accessed by going through a gate that is between Trollbeads and Stuart Robinson. If the gate is shut ring the bell to be let in. See you there!

    in reply to: 100% reserve banking #86956
    DJP
    Participant

    Not sure if this is really the right thread but this was on Radio 4 this afternoon. Another "creationist" has written a book it seems…http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08gy87s

    in reply to: Do machines produce surplus value? #124984
    DJP
    Participant
    robbo203 wrote:
    At the end of the day I feel the argument boils down to axiomatic point that,  by definition, machines dont perform abstract human labour and therefore cannot be said to generate value in these terms.  .  If you are going to criticise a theory you have to stick with its basic definitions and follow through the logic of the argument to its conclusion. You cannot surreptitiously import another definition of value into your own argument which is what Keen and co are effectively doing,

    I think this is pretty much it. The examples you give change the meaning of "value" into something different to what it means in Marx's model.

    in reply to: Do machines produce surplus value? #124971
    DJP
    Participant
    Quote:
    if two tons of coal has 1000 hours of Socially Necessary Abstract Labour (SNAL) embodied in it then the maximum amount of SNAL hours that the two tons of can possibly transfer to each product, according to Marx, is dependent on the number of products produced over the time taken to use up the coal.  So if the two tons of coal lasts for 1 year and is used to produce 50 products, the maximum value transferred from the coal to each product is 20 SNAL hours. But, contends Kitching, Marx is just inventing an example to fit the theory.  There is no reason why the two tons of coal, by amplifying the productive power of the worker should not transfer, say, 2000 SNAL hours in total over the lifetime of the machine, meaning double the number of SNAL hours embodied in the two tons of coal itself.  After all two tonnes of coal can burn for a longer amount of time than went into mining it.  So why arbitrarily set the limit of SNAL hours it can transfer to just 1000?

    When laid out like this the mistake is more obvious, no?Machines, like coal, are something that are used up in the productive process. There's nothing arbitrary about saying that their value is transfered to the product as they are used up.

    in reply to: Do machines produce surplus value? #124970
    DJP
    Participant

    Does this Kitching guy also think that coal, warehouses or spanners also produce value? If not why not?I'm suggesting he has made an elemtary blunder…

    in reply to: Real socialism #125271
    DJP
    Participant

    Interesting, but socialism obviously isn'y going to be an endless series of referenda about how many tins of baked beans we produce.

    in reply to: Raising class consciousness #125189
    DJP
    Participant

    And thishttps://www.wired.com/2017/02/cognitive-bias-president-trump-understands-better/

    in reply to: Raising class consciousness #125188
    DJP
    Participant

    This is the kind of psychological problems I had in mind..http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/27/why-facts-dont-change-our-minds

    in reply to: Creation of Nations #125226
    DJP
    Participant

    These videos by Philosophy Tube about different aspects of nationalism might be interesting:https://youtu.be/JlYUmyPoL30https://youtu.be/E_JQd-EsDjQ

    in reply to: Raising class consciousness #125179
    DJP
    Participant
    cyberrevolution1 wrote:
    i agree with you that the SPGB is a luxemburgist movement

    The SPGB isn't really "Luxemburgist" either, but certainly closer to Luxemburg than Lenin.But yes, that's not what you were asking.I think we have to utilize every method we can, and also look into the psychology of how people make and change beliefs, I think this aspect has not adequately been thought about in the past.What do you think?

    in reply to: Raising class consciousness #125175
    DJP
    Participant

    Your mistake is to think that the SPGB is a vangardist party. In fact we would agree with Rosa Luxemburg, and are against Lenin.How to propagate socialist ideas? I don't think there is one best answer or magic bullett.

    in reply to: Editorial: Russia Never Was Socialist #124232
    DJP
    Participant
    in reply to: ‘This House Believes That Capitalism Has Failed’ #124424
    DJP
    Participant

    Seems like the wrong question though. The purpose of capitalism is to reproduce and enlarge capital, and it seems to be doing that quite well. Stil I wonder if anyone did change their mind either way due to the debate, probably not I think these kind of changes happen much more slowly.

    in reply to: Must the Workers Control Parliament? #124128
    DJP
    Participant
    ALB wrote:
    Actually, when they get to Cabinet level it could be said that they are members of the capitalist class in that they do share in the surplus value extracted from the working class

    But then wouldn't we have to say that about all those working in the state sector?

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 2,238 total)