ALB
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
alanjjohnstone wrote:Apologies for the lack of paragraphs – you all know now the reason is with the website not my lack of concern or consideration.
I'm sure it's not your lack of concern or consideration, but it's not the fault of the website ! How to start a paragraph is not all that hard to master. How to do it has been explained here a number of times, I think.
Quote:The wording used will be 'The Socialist Party SPGB' and will not include 'Of Great Britain' (subject to standing orders).The case of the wording of 'The Socialist Party' will be mixed upper and lower case as indicated, and the wording of 'SPGB' will be all capitals.The wording will be on one line (not on two lines or more) and overlap as designed on design 'E' submitted.To have "The Socialist Party SPGB" on the fascia would be worse than having "The Socialist Party of Great Britain." While a case can be made out for the latter there is no resolution that can justify the former which is just plain silly. Either we use one name or the other, not two at the same time.A compromise (for those who want to surrender the name "Socialist Party" to the Trots and distinguish us from them instead of contesting their right to usurp a name we've used for decades) would be have to THE SOCIALIST PARTY on one line in big letters with "of Great Britain" in (much) smaller size on a line beneath it. Or you could put our email or website address which includes the acronym "spgb".But I don't think we are ever going to agree on this. But we don't need to. We could simply leave things as they are.
Something on this Alan missed from the Truthout site:http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/21605-rethinking-economics-from-the-uk-a-global-student-movement-takes-shape
Young Master Smeet wrote:Is a 370 wait for a big project unreasonable?I don't know. What is a "370 wait"?
Someone has posted a link to this "libertarian socialist" critique of the Zeitgeist Movement on our facebook page:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SZT7MZop44It's not bad but is direct democracy the complete answer of the technocratic tendency Zeitgeist is criticised for? Is there nothing in between, e.g. delegate democracy with majority decision-making (as well as leaving some qualified technicians to get on with the job)?
This from last night. Apparently Russell Brand is an "anarcho-populist":http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03srj6m/Analysis_The_Philosophy_of_Russell_Brand/
The review of the book by CLR James has been translated into French and is on the internet here:http://bataillesocialiste.wordpress.com/2014/02/02/la-repudiation-de-clr-james/
Yes, interesting as you say. I noted this part in particular:
Quote:Q: Right-wing parties and fascist groups play a role in the protests. How important are they actually? Do they get much support? How do other protesters relate to them?A: Far right party Svoboda is the most organized of the three large political forces trying to control the protest. They are the only party which has real active cells in various regions, actual activist base. So, as the most organized and the most ideological of the three, they are gaining the most. Apart from Svoboda, there is an umbrella coalition of neo-nazi militant groups. It is called Right Sector. They were formed in the beginning of the protests, and by now they've succeeded to gain enormous prominence and conquer sympathies from apolitical and liberal people. They are mostly famous by their demonstrative militancy and aggression, and the public doesn't see anything wrong with these cute young patriots. Lately, the same pattern repeats in other regions, where neo-nazi football hooligans turned out to be the main assault force fighting the police and pro-government thugs.The fascist hegemony was indisputable until January 19th, when the protests were joined by lots of other people – random apolitical citizens, liberals and even the left. That happened because the agenda of the protests shifted to repealing the "dictatorship laws" passed on January 16. Since then they had to step back a bit but nevertheless it's obvious that in the long run these protests will enormously benefit the far right, whoever wins. In the case of the victory of the opposition, they will surely get themselves the police forces, special services etc. If Yanukovych wins, this means that half of the country will become firm supporters of the far-right as supposedly the only patriotic radical force able to confront the dictator.It seems that, just as in Syria, the Western Powers are using movements to which they claim to be ideologically opposed to further their ends. That it's not about "democracy" but realpolitik as to which sphere of influence the Ukraine is to fall into: the West's (Germany's in particular) or Russia's.
Here's the case Peter Tatchell will presumably be putting:http://www.petertatchell.net/social_justice/imagining-economic-democracy.htm
Meanwhile the US Trotskyists are campaigning for a minimum wage of $15 a hour as opposed to this Republican's $12.Since the rate of exchange for the dollar is about $1 = 67p, that's a demand for a minimum wage of £10 an hour. Which is what their counterparts in Britain are campaigning for not by negotiating with employers but to be imposed on them by government legislation. Some hope. Campaigning for the abolition of the wages system would be more realistic.
Latest news from Brighton parish. Local councillor quotes Shakespeare and calls for a Labour-Tory-Green administration that will carry through the cuts:http://www.brightonandhovenews.org/2014/01/30/greens-lose-no-confidence-vote-but-stay-in-office/27065
We've more or less worked out what a minority of local councillors would do, but you're talking about the situation where there's a socialist majority in a local council before there's a sufficient overall majority in the rest of the country to win political power. Presumably, we wouldn't agree to administer a council as a minority administration as the Greens in Brighton have done. But would we agree to administer the council even if we have a majority? Another option would be allow the minority of pro-capitalist councillors to form a minority administration.But do we have to say anything more today than that whatever is decided will be decided democratically by the socialist movement in the light of the precise circumstances? Which implies, as you say, that a democratic decision once made has to be abided by by those who might not have voted for it.
I agree with Alan that this is hypocrisy coming from a Labourite even though I can easily believe anything the Green Party tried would be a shambles. Glad to see, though, that the Greens are having trouble pushing through the 20mph limit. I've been arguing against the local LibDem councillors in my ward who want to impose it everywhere, including on the nearby main A road. It's crazy on a main road. Anybody ever tried driving a modern car at 20mph for any length of time?
I'm not sure Kliman or the MHI would describe themselves as "disequilibium theorists" (except insofar as every crisis is a reflection of a disequilibium; we ourselves have preferred "disproportionality"). They are more into the falling rate of profit. But all will be revealed when our long-discussed interview with Kliman appears in the March Socialist Standard, though there will be a taster in the February issue out on Friday on this debate in New York.
