‘Official’ on line party outlets. Should the Intenet Committee decide?
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 10 months ago by
.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
-
Posts
-
Who decides which ones are 'official' Or is online democracy not really important to most members?
Are branch outlets not 'official'?
Rule 7
Quote:7. The Branch shall be the unit of organisation. A Branch may be formed by not less than six members making written application on the prescribed form to the Executive Committee and receiving their sanction. Where two or more Branches exist in any single Parliamentary or Local Government area, the Branches shall federate for the purposes jointly concerning them.Rule 11
Quote:11. Branches, Groups and members shall neither publish, sell or distribute any political literature in the name of the Party, excepting handbills and leaflets, which has not been approved by the Executive Committee or the New Pamphlets Committee. Election Statements and Election Manifestos, being Official Party Statements, must be approved by the Executive Committee.and Rule 31
Quote:31. A Branch or member acting in a manner deemed by the EC to be an infringement of the Principles or Rules, or detrimental to the interests of the Party shall be immediately suspended by the EC from all Party business except the matter in dispute. The EC shall forthwith submit particulars of the charge to all Branches and at the same time communicate the charges in writing to the accused and enclose a copy of this rule. Branches shall hold at least one specially summoned meeting to discuss the charge. The Delegates at the next Delegate Meeting or Annual Conference shall hear the case of the EC and of the accused; after which no further circulation of arguments for or against the charge may take place. The Delegates shall submit their findings to a Party Poll and the result of the Party Poll shall apply as from the date of suspension. No parties to the charge or dispute shall be allowed to sit as Delegates or Chair at Conference, ADM or any EC meeting where the case is being reviewed.Are these accounts official? There are many more @OfficialSPGBhttp://socialismoryourmoneyback.blogspot.co.uk/https://www.facebook.com/groups/worldsocialism/https://www.facebook.com/pages/Socialist-Party-of-Great-Britain/105481856152052?fref=ts&rf=110790122282280https://twitter.com/imposs1916 https://twitter.com/4SocialismNow
Do SWP branches (Swansea, York etc.) operate their own twitter accounts autonomously of the central committee?If Leninist "democratic centralist" parties can allow branches to tweet autonomously then so can we.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.