TheOldGreyWhistle wrote:I

December 2025 Forums General discussion The ‘Occupy’ movement TheOldGreyWhistle wrote:I

#86528
Anonymous
Inactive
TheOldGreyWhistle wrote:
I think it matters. During the 1984 miners strike I was putting the case for socialism on the picket line and it would not help if the Standard tells them that socialists don’t support you and your ‘leader’ is a con man etc etc. It is important that the SPGB doesn’t appear to be the enemy of the working class.

Look, the best people to decide what to do in a strike are the workers involved in it.  The last thing they want are ‘outsiders’, like the SWP for example, muscling in on their dispute.  Why would the “SPGB appear to be the enemy of the working class”?; we are workers ourselves but as a political party we are concerned principally with the political struggle.  However, we need to ‘tell it as we see it’; opinions often hurt, even offend occasionally, but they rarely inflict any permanent damage.Here are links to a pamphlet written by the party at the close of the Miners’ Strike and an article written twenty years later which you may find helpful.http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/pamphlets/strike-weapon-lessons-miners%E2%80%99-strikehttp://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/socialist-standard/2000s/2004/no-1195-march-2004/miners-strike

TheOldGreyWhistle wrote:
Did we support or oppose democracy in Poland or did we just not oppose it?

My memory is that the Party never expressed support for Solidarity as a political party. Solidarity began as a trade union that also demanded democratic rights. It was entirely right that the Party should express enthusiasm about that.  As the situation developed Solidarity became a reformist political party and when this happened we opposed it.