Mike Foster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 269 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Summer School 2014 #96466
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    Thanks for the suggestions – I'll enquire at Warwick University and Harborne Hall. Warwick might be more difficult to get to by train and looks more expensive. The B&B rates there are at least £78 per night in September (the website wouldn't let me check rates in June or July), which is twice as much as Fircroft before taking into account the use of conference facilities. Harborne Hall will probably work out more expensive than Fircroft (it was £400 more last time), and there were some issues with the accommodation. My personal preference is for Fircroft, despite the alcohol ban and breakfasts.I'm in favour of increasing the subsidy. Up to now, I've been able to work within the existing subsidy while also ensuring that anyone who wants to go has a place. So, even if there is no increase we can still work with existing arrangements.I won't bother trying to avoid a clash with Marxism, based on the helpful posts above.

    in reply to: Summer School #92750
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    That was quick! Thanks for uploading the uploads!

    in reply to: Summer School #92740
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    Well, it's all over for another year. Thanks, everyone, for making it  to sunny Brum, and I hope you had an enjoyable and interesting weekend. There'll be a write-up of the event, and talks will be available to listen to in due course.

    in reply to: Summer School #92739
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    Not long now! I hope anyone who's travelling to sunny Birmingham has a good journey, and I'll see you tomorrow!

    in reply to: Summer School #92738
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    The bus stops around New Street station have changed recently. If anyone's getting a 61 or 63 bus from Birmingham city centre to Selly Oak, the web page below has details of where they start from: http://www.networkwestmidlands.com/web/FILES/BCCImaps/new61.pdfhttp://nxbus.co.uk/files/NXWestMids/current_timetables/B061_02Sep12.pdf 

    in reply to: Summer School #92737
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    It's only two weeks until Summer School! If you want to go, but haven't yet made a booking, please let me know soon (as the venue is asking for numbers).

    in reply to: Summer School #92732
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    As promised, all the 'Relationships' Summer School sessions can now be announced!Friday evening: Steve Clayton on Family In Class Society: From Engels To Anti-OedipusSaturday morning: Mike Foster on Alienation At WorkSaturday afternoon: Jacqueline Shodeke on The SPGB Object And Principles – Their Relationship To The Political And Non-Political Working Class And To Earth ItselfSaturday afternoon: What's In A Word? Exploring What We Mean By 'Comrade' – A Workshop. Facilitated by Richard FieldSaturday evening: Bill Martin on "If We Had But World Enough, And Time": Relations With The DeadSunday morning: Mike Foster on Facing Up To Physiognomy – The Pseudoscience That Won't Go AwayMore details can be found here: http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/event/summer-school-2013-birmingham

    in reply to: Summer School #92735
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    If you've already made a booking, details of the venue and session times will be arriving through your letterbox in a few days' time. This includes info about a so-far unannounced extra!

    in reply to: Summer School #92734
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    Available only at Summer School: a new pamphlet of Socialist Standard articles on the theme of relationships!

    in reply to: Summer School #92733
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    There's a facebook summer school page, where more updates on the event will be posted. It's here: https://www.facebook.com/events/397277923702854/?fref=ts

    in reply to: Summer School #92727
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    I'm pleased to announce the first confirmed talk of the weekend: Steve Clayton will discuss 'Family In Class Society: Engels to Anti-Oedipus'.More announcements are on the way!

    in reply to: The Hunger Games #93893
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    I haven't seen or read any of the Hunger Games films or books, but they certainly look interesting based on what Ed says. It would be interesting to know what the author of the books' political views are, and if any of them have been toned down for the film adaptations, in the same way that the film of V For Vendetta has a different political message to that of the original graphic novel.The premise of the Hunger Games reminds me a bit of Logan's Run, which describes a future society where anyone over 21 (in the book) or 30 (in the film) is 'eliminated'. Here, it's a metaphor for fears of overpopulation (which were more prevalent in the 60s and 70s when this came out than they are now) and fears of aging (which are probably more prevalent now).As for comparisons with Lord of the Flies, I'm not sure if there's much of a link. Lord of the Flies gives the view that people can't co-operate without the framework for society being imposed by an elite. This would probably be the view of the fictional elite in The Hunger Games, but based on what Ed says, this wouldn't be the message of the film/book itself, which sounds more optimistic about co-operation. 

    Mike Foster
    Participant

    The CCS kindly invited me along as a guest speaker. The talk's a revised version of the 'Marxism, Physics and Philosophy'  one given in Clapham last year.If anyone can make it, mine's a pint of bitter.

    in reply to: Reification (plus reading group suggestions) #91714
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    Sorry,  DJP, I probably misunderstood about Rubin. Looking at the text, we should probably discuss more than just chapter 3. I'm not sure if we need a week of reading time before posting comments, but I'm happy to go with the consensus.

    in reply to: Reification (plus reading group suggestions) #91710
    Mike Foster
    Participant

    Count me in, with another vote for the Rubin text. I think the length of this text is about right, to start off with anyway. I think we should be wary of discussing whole books, especially something as weighty as Capital, where chapters or sections should be discussed in more digestible chunks.I tend to prefer as few limits or moderation as possible. So, I think some of the suggestions made above might restrict the discussion a little. In particular, I don't think we need to restrict membership or have too much active moderation of responses. We should probably post a few ground rules as a permanent thread on that section of the forum, though, such as reminders about relevance of comments, avoiding personal abuse etc. Hopefully common sense will guide most people.In terms of timescales, I think two weeks would be about the right length of time for a particular text to be discussed, with comments allowed right from when the thread opens. Perhaps threads about texts could be started on the 1st and the 15th of each month? A week or so before the start of a new text, the moderator would open a new thread to ask for suggestions and votes for the next one to be discussed. We'd then have that week to make suggestions or vote for a text someone else has suggested. A thread for an old text could be left open after its fortnight in the spotlight, in case anyone wants to add to it afterwards. After a while, we should have an interesting bank of threads about different texts. It would be nice to occasionally discuss films or TV programmes as well as written texts (as long as they would be able to elicit enough meaty discussion, which might be a rarity).

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 269 total)