Russian Tensions
- This topic has 5,850 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 3 hours, 41 minutes ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Trump, i.e. the US President, no longer appears to be NATO’s boss.
Kremlin warns of ‘full-scale nuclear war’ as NATO plans a ‘pre-emptive strike’ on Russia
According to this news center, Russia has some new military weapons that the European power and the USA do not have at the present time
https://www.voltairenet.org/article223118.html
Russia possessed the capability to disconnect NATO orders from its own weapons. This wasn’t a form of jamming; the weapons simply stopped responding to commands. Since some observers doubted its effectiveness, Russia extended this system to all of Syria. And because it operated within a circular area, it partially extended it, for two days, to Lebanon, Iraq, and Turkey. No civilian aircraft were able to fly. Subsequently, they deployed this weapon in Kaliningrad and the Black Sea.
Europe will strike first, within the timeframe laid down by Merz & Co. They will not give up power by accepting Kiev’s defeat.
War by 2030 is EU plan.
Why is NATO voicing Brussels’ view of the war instead of Washington’s? Is the US President no longer in charge of NATO?
Generation Z falling into line with Brussels’ and the Coalition’s manipulation in Budapest to oust Orban and vote in a war president.
EU suggesting security agreement which is basically NATO’s Article 5, which means Ukraine can strike Russia and, if Russia strikes back, all of the EU states join in militarily.
So this is no different from NATO membership.
Russia will be unable to agree to this, and so will be lambasted again by Washington as the side which refused a peace deal.
The Europeans and UK are winning this as we are led into a wider war.The US will impose maybe this week more sanctions on Russia if Russia does not agree to the Ukraine-Europe-US deal which includes NATO troops going into Ukraine and an Article 5 provision for Kiev.
https://tass.com/world/2059877
How does this tally with the view of others here?
The United States’ real position is with Europe and Kiev. The talks with Russia are a smokescreen and go nowhere, and the fallback position is always with NATO.
The US is still fighting this proxy war and the European continent is to be the testing ground.Russia is not going to agree to NATO troops being stationed in Ukraine, and sanctions on Russia are proving increasingly ineffectual, so I suspect all that is going to happen is that the war is going to drag on until finally the whole of Donbass falls under Russian control. Given the steady, if slow, advances of the Russian army, this outcome seems increasingly inevitable.
It’s probably at that point that there will be a real prospect of a peace treaty being signed. For all the warmongering bluster of Starmer, Macron and Merz, the war will come to an end probably sooner than later. It’s quite like that Zelensky will soon be ousted and maybe move abroad so that a more accommodating successor government might be installed in Ukraine. I can’t imagine support for this stupid, senseless war continuing much longer after four years of misery and power cuts in the middle of winter.
Of course, the war will have adversely impacted the Russian economy too, so the Putin regime will likewise be forced to compromise. He is no less an obnoxious poseur than those politicians on the other side of this conflict. To hell with the lot of them. It makes my stomach turn having to watch this bunch of manipulative sociopaths on the telly
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.