Russian Tensions
- This topic has 5,827 replies, 42 voices, and was last updated 3 days, 1 hour ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Yes, Starmer’s “coalition of the willing” is (fortunately) more a coalition of the silly than a coalition of the killing.
Revealing article here (from Hong Kong) about one of the vultures waiting for the end of the war to invest in Ukraine, whether in the part ruled by the government there or in the part controlled by Russia. They want to know where the line of demarcation will be as, wherever it is, it will pass through the area where the rare earths and the rich agricultural soil are.
https://tass.com/world/1929359
30 countries to police Ukraine.
Another scrap of paper torn up:
“Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia say they’re pulling out of the Ottawa Convention, a treaty banning anti-personnel landmines, citing the growing military threat from Russia.”
Putin shows capitalist thinking.
No bombing of oil refineries etc., for 30 days, but bombing people in towns, cities and villages is fine. Priorities!
In tactical terms, a partial-only ceasefire makes it hard for the British et al to send troops.
https://tass.com/world/1930899
British going ahead.
And Europe too.
More NATO “democracy”. After Rumania another NATO state bans an opposition presidential candidate:
What is the capitalist economic logic for the UK and EU provoking war with Russia, a suicidal choice?
Especially without the United States, which would still be suicide.
There is no logic that I can see, not even from a capitalist viewpoint.Bloody hell! We’ll be getting ours next!
If Starmer decides to issue such a thing to us, I’m chucking mine straight in the bin.
In such a case, will the Party address the issue?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.