The Money Multiplier FableThe

December 2025 Forums General discussion 100% reserve banking The Money Multiplier FableThe

#86836
simondv
Participant

The Money Multiplier FableThe money multiplier story – a fable really – claims that banks expand loans and deposits on the basis of a central bank function that gradually feeds reserves to banks, allowing them to expand their balance sheets with new loans and reservable deposits – according to reserve ratios that bind the pace of that expansion according to the reserves supplied. This is entirely wrong, of course. In fact, bank balance sheet expansion occurs largely through the endogenous process whereby loans create deposits. And central banks that impose reserve requirements provide the required reserve levels as a matter of automatic operational response – after the loan and deposit expansion that generates the requirement has occurred. The multiplier fable describes a central bank with direct exogenous control over bank expansion, based on a reserve supply function – which is a fiction. The facts of endogenous money creation have been demonstrated by empirical studies going back decades. Moreover, the facts are obvious to anybody who has actually been involved with or closely studied the actual reserve management operations of either a commercial bank or a central bank. In truth, no empirical ‘study’ is required – the banking world operates this way on a daily basis – and it is absurd that so many economics textbooks make up stories to the contrary. The truth of the ‘loans creates deposits’ meme is pretty well understood now – at least by those who take the time to learn the facts about it.This illustrates what I said earlier abuout the money multiplier, and is taken from this  http://monetaryrealism.com/loans-create-deposits-in-context/ which Alan JJohnstone used as a reference in his post above. The authors are actually saying here that loans come before deposits, which I have highlighted in bold, and the same things are said in the book "Where does money come from ?" by NEF