Skip to Content

Boris who?

Does the election of a Tory mayor of London
mean the end of civilisation as we know it?

I came back from attending the London elections count on the 2nd of May, to find the following letter on my welcome mat, from a Labour Party member of my acquaintance.

Dear Pik,

As I write, Tories overhead are taking over my city. Otherwise civilised people, with a knowledge of Beethoven and Shakespeare, are trying to enact Tory policies. I am currently cowering in my cellar, with my Grandads old steel helmet on my head, and a phrase book of how to speak Tory. I have stockpiled on bully beef and powdered egg, and with my knife tied to a broomstick I am prepared to last out the rule of Boris Karloff or whatever his name is.

I remember our conversations, in those now far-off days of Labour rule, in which the sun always seemed to shine. You said, if I recall, that Boris is just a saloon bar bore heartland Tory who believes in small government and just letting the rich get on with running their lives. Just look, you said, at his housing policy, he wants to end the requirement to have 50 percent affordable housing (and no, I still dont know what affordable actually means in practice, nor for whom they are supposed to be affordable) on all new building projects. Instead he promised to work with the boroughs in order to build the same 55,000 such new homes. In other words, he was going to allow Tory boroughs to refuse to allow low cost housing in their halcyon areas that might attract the likes who might vote Labour. Likewise his promise to promote building that wont spoil existing views protect the rich and drive the poor into already ugly ghettoes.

I know Ive spent the last few years talking up Labours increase in policing, and how that has cut crime. You said that crime always falls while the economy grows, and showed me graphs and stuff to prove it (do you always carry those round in your pocket?); but Boris wants to cut the cost of policing, while at the same time putting more police on the tubes and buses. He wants to cut and cut taxes, and the expensive part of the mayoral budget is the police part. I know you said how can Boris be tough on crime if there isnt plenty of crime to be tough on, and I agree that the Tories do try to have it both ways, but I was shocked when you said look, the root cause of crime is free enterprise so long as there are profits to be made, and entrepreneurs ready to enter the crime market, there will be blood. How can you say such things when, under Labour, free enterprise has brought us such prosperity?

I know Ken Livingstone almost said as much, blaming the rise of teenage violent crime on his success in smashing the drugs networks (apparently, he reckons, with their foot soldiers in prison, the drugs barons just started recruiting a new generation). But, really, how could you possibly equate the likes of Shell or BAE with a bunch of violent hoodlums using violence to make money?

So what that Karloff will surround himself with are advisers he can delegate to just like the way he ran the right-wing rag The Spectator. So, you reckon, that means that theyll ensure that he stays within the law, and doesnt do anything so disastrous that the profit of the people who own London will be threatened. Most of what will change will be the mood music from city hall even if it will be the harsh sounds of the right-wing dog whistle.

Youll miss Ken now hes gone. He fought for a living wage in London £7.20 an hour, the European decency threshold. He won awards for equal opportunities the most gay friendly workplace in the country and using the London Development agency to promote Black and Minority Ethnicity businesses. OK, a lot of that was compliance with national law, so Boris will hardly be unable to undo it all, but he will say mean things, and upset a lot of people you just watch.

I mean, you said, Livingstone hasnt got rid of poverty, and cant hes consciously working within the capitalist system. Look at his arguments over the Public Private Partnership he wasnt against capitalist finance, he just thought the state should borrow on the open market, and pay profits in the form of interest on that debt.”

And you said “he didnt use his position to call for radical change, instead he used machiavellian tactics to hold on to power while working behind the scenes to secure his basis of support Thats why he lost, he just strung workers along with a few paltry promises and when a better snake oil salesman came along, they buggered off and voted for him instead. Selling promises isnt democracy, its the politics of the market place, and Ken was just out-entreprenuered by Karloff.

So, you reckon Ken lost because the workers preferred what the Tories had on offer and wanted that. I dont believe it, I think their minds were warped by the Evening Standard using mind rays or something. How could they possibly want to vote for someone who will allow them to drive gas guzzling cars, opposes a 24 hour freedom pass for pensioners and who will doubtless cut back on free bus travel for school kids?

Next youll be telling me that the fact that the BNP won a seat isnt a cause for concern. I know what youll say, that they just got one of the seats that went to UKIP at the last election (the Tories got the other), and so that just means that the anti-immigration rightwing majority on the GLA will be maintained (yes, I know the fact that under PR the right predominated previously shows that there is mass support for such views in London, and that Karloffs victory is just a reflection of this).

Of course, the three seats for the Liberals make them decisive, but given that theyve tacked onto the cost cutting message of the Tories, and ran on a platform of tax cuts theyll back the Tories on crucial votes to try and woo the latters supporters. At least you and I agree on this, that the Lib-Dems are yellow Tories, people who just cant admit to themselves that they are Tories.

But the BNP are fascists I know, theyre mostly ageing suburban cockneys who are deeply confused. What was that you were telling me about the BNPer you overheard talking about why he believed his mixed race grandson that he was raising should be allowed into the BNP (despite understanding the need to protect the species)? I know its irrational and that theyre clinging to this sense of identity. Of course, the Tory party has long contained such people, and if the workers come to believe such nonsense theres nothing we could do to stop them.

Except, you were there when we both heard Frank Dobson MP suggesting we should just change the electoral rules to keep the BNP out. That seems fair to me these people are opposed to democracy anyway, so we need to take away their votes in order to save voting. After all, if we can point to the BNP we can persuade people to vote for us to keep them out. I know you keep saying that unless we give people something to be for, and actively try to change their minds, then the BNP is what you get. I know that Brown shamelessly pandered to their prejudices with the slogan British jobs for British workers that the BNP then prominently displayed on their election material. But trying to change peoples minds is a way to lose elections, unless we tell them what they want to hear, well never get to get into government and enact our programme.

So, the socialism you talk about sounds lovely. Its a great idea, but no-one will ever go for it. In the meanwhile weve got to try and run capitalism as it exists. We dont have time for changing minds, for education, for the hard slog of building up a clear line of advance, we just need to adjust how we sell our product better. Brown will try and make out that he has gifts to give the electors in return for their votes, and if we overcome this mid-term blip, then, at least, we might hang on, or at least deny the Tories a majority.

Anyway, I must go now, I think I heard Tories trying to sniff me out. Ill come out of my bunker when its safe, until then, heres a record of me chanting Boris, Boris, Boris, out, out, out. Hey, back to the good old days under the Tories, stormy meetings, out on the streets. We can do it all again!

Yours,

L. P. Hack.

Sigh.

These may be related...