Young Master Smeet: “A wall
July 2026 › Forums › General discussion › Rosa Lichenstein and Anti-Dialectics? › Young Master Smeet: “A wall
Young Master Smeet:
“A wall is something. I cannot walk through a wall. Things that are there can be materially interacted with. Things that are not there cannot be. there is no way to touch, see, smell or apprehend nothing. Likewise, nothing cannot impede my action, nor cause effects.”
Indeed, but how are the things you told us were nothing actually nothing? And you have yet to tell us how something can struggle with nothing.
“So you accept everything is connected, ultimately?”
Not at all, I was merely drawing out a consequence of what you had said. I neither assert nor deny that everything is interconnected since that would be a metaphysical proposition, and thus non-sensical:
http://www.soviet-empire.com/ussr/viewtopic.php?f=107&t=52252
“And from that it follows that everything is simply a permutation of this initial energy (including the energy that manifests as matter). And if we follow the laws of thermodynamics, that evergy cannot be created or destroyed, then it follows that nothing can happen that does not affect other entities within the system”
But, not even this shows that everthing is connected, let alone interconnected. I think you are confusing the phrase ‘common origin’ with the term ‘interconnected’.
“I think there is a passing reference to the notion in (that name again) Brian Cox’ “Why does E=MC^2″.”
I’m sorry, but my enigma translation module seems to be out of action today, so I’ll need you to put this in plain English if I am to respond to it.
