lindanesocialist wrote:Three
lindanesocialist wrote:
Three personal insults does not really counter his argument, tho, does it? This is the way our own position is criticised. Is it not more constructive to deal with the substantive content of what he is saying rather than simply sticking labels on him?
I doubt he would take two of those as an insult.If you want to know why what he says is crankism, I suggest you read this thread from the beginning or search the site for "fractional reserve"