Quote: There is a difference

December 2025 Forums General discussion 100% reserve banking Quote: There is a difference

#86988
Anonymous
Inactive
Quote:
There is a difference between capitalism with barter,

 This is not capitalism. capitalism is an immense production of commodities , for sale, for profit of a minoritycapitalist  class, on a market.

Quote:
capitalism with a gold standard currency, capitalism with digital capital, and multi-currency capitalism.

No difference in any of those. Those are all means of exchange and only relevant in the context of production of commodities for sale or exchange for profit, in a market and therefore redundant in a post-capitalist, free access socialist society, where *production is of utilities for use, with self determined free access to them*.

Quote:
there is a difference between socialism with barter,

That is not socialism. (See * above.)

Quote:
socalism wth editing privieledges for all digital property

There will not be digital private property, save personal stuff. If stuff is published it is everybody's.

Quote:
vs socialism without editing priviledges for all digital property.

There will be no privileged access or property.

Quote:
you simply can't create a stock market with a barter economy because it's impractical from a behavioral economics calculation.

Because it is not  a market and not capitalism.

Quote:
  So I'm looking at the behavioral economics costs and benefits for socialism differnt modes of information delivery and exchange.

So a waste of time then. Largely irrelevant as economics, as we/you know it, will be unnecessary as we will have replaced calculation in kind for economic calculation. Economic calculation will have expired, ceased to be, redundant, dead, finito, kaput.

Quote:
Please understand also this is not an attack on the someones choice of a PDF and I intend no criticizm to the person who owns the pdf.   The choice in this case is of no importance except as a didactic exercize to explain to you the implications of modern technology.

The exercise is irrelevant. The only technological implication we need is can the assistance of technology of all kinds, be helpful for the purpose of delivering a superabundance of utilities to satisfy peoples human needs.To this end we will have self-regulating stock control systems and calculation in kind.Socialism has been possible since the start of last century never mind this one, even without the present day technology.Our priority is getting that message out to as many people as possible. To hasten the world my signature below depicts.