Addressing the migrant crisis

December 2025 Forums General discussion Addressing the migrant crisis

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #84899
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Since the start of the Syrian Civil War, many people have fled Syria and migrated into Europe, North America, and other regions. This has given many Right wing movements the green light to target a new enemy they perceive to be a threat to western society.

    Many Right wingers claim the Muslim refugees are barbarians, rapist, terrorist, uncivilised and many other negative accusations. Since 2015, there have been criminal and terrorist activities happening in Europe. Most Right-wingers claim the Muslim refugees are responsible for these atrocities.

    They do have a good argumental point. In most Muslims nations, men are considered to be the hegemons who control society and women tend to be a servant figure. They are deeply devoted to their religion and practice atrocities that in most western nations would be considered illegal. Some of these Syrian refugees have multiple wives and even are married to minors below the age of 18.

    Several weeks ago, I interviewed Right-wing activists who are deeply anti-Muslims. They claim all Muslims are bad. However, this isn't really true.

    It's disturbing that most secular and democratic figures who used to govern some of these Middle Eastern countries are either dead or were forced to flee their home country.

    During the 1920’s, Afghanistan used to have a queen who would encourage Muslim women to stop wearing hijabs and start bringing prosperity. Iran used to have democratic figures who would encourage all Iranians to get an education in order to bring prosperity to Iran.

    Sadly, the only current Muslim nation that is still secular and embraces some western tradition is Turkey. They might have their own problems, but it's much more democratic and opportunistic compare to any other Muslim nation.

    I know journalist colleagues who work in Lebanon. They claim all male figures make more money, they all work in management and women tend to be discriminated and are expected to be lower-ranking figures.

    When I interviewed Right-wingers to discuss the topic on the migration crisis, they claim all Muslims are evil. They believe the refugees want to invade Europe to spread their evilness and destroy conservative values.

    Most Right-wingers I interviewed could not even answer where this extremist originated, they only assume all Muslims are evil.

    When I asked them the role Saudi Arabia had in destroying Muslim culture and society, they were clueless. When I asked them about the Wahhabi mosques the Saudis want to build across Europe, they couldn’t provide an answer. When I asked them about the sectarian wars the Saudis have been promoting for decades, they were speechless.

    The Saudis have already built some Wahhabi mosques in Sweden, Belgium and other western nations. They won’t accept any refugees, but they are willing to spread their poison ideas by building Wahhabi mosque and spreading their propaganda messages. They are also the ones who armed these Islamic groups that launch guerrilla warfares. 

    The refugee crisis could have many negative effects in changing society and the political spectrum. Many far Right wingers are using fear to advocate why they should be elected in order to form a police state. They claim all Muslims are dangerous to society and should be vetted. 

    This migrant crisis should be addressed, if this problem is not address, these Right wingers will use their fear strategy in winning elections and overthrow democratic values. 

    The other problem occurring is that these refugees are fleeing the Middle East to escape from the war zones. However, they are not fleeing to a Gulf State country or Muslim country. They are all fleeing to Europe. They don’t want to remain in their home country.

    There are solutions that could end the refugee's crisis and encourage Muslims to resettle to their home country.

    This crisis could be ended  if the Middle East were to be rebuild. If democratic, secular and socialist ideas were to return to the Middle East, the region could become more stable and prosperous. Many Muslim nations have lost their old believes in democracy, freedom, equality, secularism and progression.

    In the past, most Muslims believed in equality, democracy, and progression. Women used to work in government sectors forming laws regarding healthcare, education, welfare and equality. They were also professors, engineers and scientists.

    If a Muslim country like Iraq were to have women, secularist and democrats in government, they could end the sectarian conflicts and bring back prosperity, progression, and equality. Also, if a Muslim country like Iraq were to elect a female progressive president or prime minister, it would destroy the fundamentalist myth that women are inferior.

    For decades, the Saudis have popularised the myth that women are inferior. They used to get upset when they would see women working in government sectors and receive equality and opportunities in places like Iran and South Yemen.

    Bringing back many of the traditional progression ideas and democracy could encourage many refugees that there are many opportunities and prosperity they could accomplish in their home countries.

    The Middle East used to be a destination that would attract many westerners for tourism and migration. I have met many non-Iranians who used to live in Iran prior to the revolution. They claim prior to the revolution, living in Iran was equivalent to living in Italy or France.

    Rebuilding Middle Eastern society would have many positive effects in making more people become secular, progressive and more pro-westerners. This strategy successfully worked in Germany. After the war ended in 1945, the country was literally destroyed and the humanitarian aid helped rebuild their infrastructure. Some people who fled the country after the war decided to resettle back to Western Germany to enjoy a new life.

    Some of these war-torn Middle Eastern nations should receive the same humanitarian aid that Germany had after the war. These strategies have many positive impacts of ending conflicts, improving human rights,  guaranteeing stability, bringing progression and opportunities for all people.

    #122053
    alanjjohnstone
    Keymaster

    I genuinely not at all sure of this post. For sure it provides a one-sided account of the right-wing nationalist backlash against a problem that capitalism inadvertently created when they didn't appreciate fully the unintended consequences of their geo-political military interventions in. I don't succumb to the conspiracy theory the neo-cons of the Illuminati  were planning all this to happen…They just lost control.Yes if there is to be humanitarian aid it has to be on the scale of Marshall Aid and the UN and all the NGOs keep calling for such a global response as a solution. The only thing stopping it is the political will. It is a perfectly manageable crisis. It is not some insurmountable challenge, not an impossible task. It has been done before.  A million Pied-Noir from Algeria arriving in France, for example.Within days/weeks Hungarians fleeing the Russian tanks in 1956 and in the 70s Vietnamese boat people were farmed out to scores of countries by the receiving nations. With German unification, the Ossies migrating to what was West Germany was coped with, an insignificant and barely noticeable small tax created to pay for it.Much of your article concentrates on the religious aspects of the migration. Again UK have had Pakistanis and Bangladesh muslims for decades and now generations. Never perceived as a threat or a problem until the Middle East wars sparked off militant islam and then islamophobia  …previously the xenophobia against UK immigration was simply racism against brown skins, i doubt religion ever featured much. 

    #122054
    ALB
    Keymaster

    Yes, the corrupt Saudi theocracy has a lot to answer for.

    #122055
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The problem of the Middle East is not religion, it is the petroleum, and the natural resources, and the capitalist economy, those problems started before WWI, and the Western Powers did not care anything about the conditions of the women of that region, about human rights, killing and terrorism, they were also  the  ones who established dictatorial government in that region. Those are crocodile tearsChristians , Jewish, and Muslin lived in the same area in peace and harmony for more than 900 years, and all of them practiced their own religion without any frictions, and without any problems, until oil was discovered .In Syria they have an army integrated by Christians  women, and in Iran they have also an army integrated by Muslim women, and in Colombia the guerrillas fighters knows as FARC they have a large army integrated by women and they are CatholicsThe original terrorists in that region were the western powers, and terrorism has spread in a larger scale after the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. In Iraq Christians, Muslim,  and Catholic were part of the government of Saddam Hussein, and they lived together without any frictions, and when the army brought an army of Christians pastors they were trying to force them to become Christians, as they did in KoreaIn Afghanistan they have discovered a new mineral that is stronger than diamond, and the US capitalist want to take those minerals to use them to produce more profits, and for the perforation of more oil wells, and for the mining industryIraq was a very modern country and it was completely  destroyed by the US  invasion,( they have destroyed Lebanon, Syria,  Kuwait, Palestine )  and before that , millions of peoples died due to the embargo, and now thousands of peoples are being contaminated with uranium and children are born with genetics defects, and women are sterilized, they dropped more bombs in Iraq than during world war ii, and the combination of atomic radioactivity is larger than the  two bombs dropped in Japan. Is that the so called Western civilization ? Probably, in the US they are going to elect  a woman as a president, and she was part of the killing and massacres that were perpetrated in Libya and Syria, and she was an  allied of  the same terrorists that they are attacking at the present time,  and probably, she will continue with the same criminal war that is being taking place for more than 12 years, a war longer than WWII.Terrorism is the new excuse that has  replaced the so called soviet communism, even more, they do not want ISIS to be completely exterminates, they need them, and they have used them in several occasions. It is terrorism versus terrorism. It is like the war on drugs, which is also the war to bring more drugs and more weapons, after the invasion in Afghanistan the drugs traffic and production increased to 300%, and heroin is replacing cocaine, so, who, is the real terrorist ? or Is it terrorism versus terrorism ?The US government is building an army of terrorist in Latin America using all kind of criminals, terrorists, paramilitary,  and assassin to fight in the Middle east, and they are not Muslims, they are Catholics or Christians, the death of the members of that mercenary army is not shown in the statistic of the PentagonPS: Germany was not rebuilt with humanitarian aid, it was thru the large exploitation of the German working class, there is nothing humanitarian in the capitalist society. The world situation at the present time is not the same as the conditions after world war II

    #122056
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    ALB wrote:
    Yes, the corrupt Saudi theocracy has a lot to answer for.

    And the US government too

    #122057
    ALB
    Keymaster

    Of course.

    #122058
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/education/depth-articles/history/economic-causes-gulf-warThis articles will put better seasoning to the  real causes of the conflict in the Middle East. The real historical period started in 1891

    #122059
    alanjjohnstone
    Keymaster

    Worth a watch of a talk-radio presenter contrasting the fact that 16 million brits have less than 100 pounds savings and their stupid concern about the number of migrantshttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/james-obrien-lbc-powerful-tirade-britain-immigration-a7339756.html

    #122060
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    alanjjohnstone wrote:
    Worth a watch of a talk-radio presenter contrasting the fact that 16 million brits have less than 100 pounds savings and their stupid concern about the number of migrantshttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/james-obrien-lbc-powerful-tirade-britain-immigration-a7339756.html

    There is a new world  trend like in Germany in 1930, to blame the economical problems in somebody else. Let's blame it on the workers. In Puerto Rico the blame is in 100 thousands Dominicans that have emigrated to the island, and there are two millions Puerto Rican who has emigrated to the USA, and all the factories were moved to Vietnam after their owner had 30 years  of tax exemption (, Ali Baba and the forty thieves )The biggest seller of commodities are the stores that sell luggage, and the whole country is in bankruptcy. It looks like  the blame must fall on capitalism, like in Germany in 1930. The others blamed the problem on one individual known as Hitler, and they destroyed Europe, and others destroyed Iraq looking for one individuals, Ex-Friends and allied of the Western powers. The new blame is on the Arabians and Muslin, next time they will blame it on the Buddhists from China. They always need an enemy

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.