{"id":243313,"date":"2023-05-11T11:52:50","date_gmt":"2023-05-11T11:52:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.worldsocialism.org\/spgb\/?post_type=snippet&#038;p=243313"},"modified":"2023-05-11T11:56:33","modified_gmt":"2023-05-11T11:56:33","slug":"mobile-phone-wars","status":"publish","type":"snippet","link":"https:\/\/www.worldsocialism.org\/spgb\/snippet\/mobile-phone-wars\/","title":{"rendered":"Your phone-y friends"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/news\/business-65485868\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Just recently<\/a> a mobile phone company accused rival operators of swindling their customers by deliberately failing to move them onto cheaper tariffs once they&#8217;d paid in full for their phones. Naturally the other phone companies protested that the accusations were &#8216;misleading&#8217; and &#8216;confusing&#8217; (but, you notice, not &#8216;untrue&#8217;).<\/p>\n<p>Capitalist firms bickering over altruistic concern for their customers? Surely not. In volume 1 of <em>Capital<\/em>, Marx relates how big factory owners pressed for health &#038; safety measures which small factory owners couldn&#8217;t afford, not through concern for workers&#8217; welfare, but simply to drive the other firms out of business. Here, the intention is similar, to stop rivals getting an unfair advantage. It&#8217;s backstabbing dressed up as customer care.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","class_list":["post-243313","snippet","type-snippet","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.worldsocialism.org\/spgb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/snippet\/243313","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.worldsocialism.org\/spgb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/snippet"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.worldsocialism.org\/spgb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/snippet"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.worldsocialism.org\/spgb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=243313"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}