admin

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 198 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New SPGB website?? #151545

    admin
    Participant

    I only just saw this. It has been flagged up for action. Perhaps under ‘Forum’, we should have a ‘Join the Forum’ option. Please be patient while it all is worked through.

    in reply to: Marx and Automation #128734

    admin
    Participant

    I keep expecting to see something about Marx and automation in this thread.This is Hardy from 1965 on our website and also below,https://www.marxists.org/archive/hardcastle/automation.htmThis is on Medium .com, if you sift through the nonsense.Did Karl Marx Predict Artificial Intelligence 170 Years Ago?

    in reply to: Marx and Automation #128725

    admin
    Participant
    Quote:
    Steve-SanFrancisco-UserExperienceResearchSpecialist wrote:Can someone link to a policy or topic thread for me to continue this discussion where it might be more relevant. I'm sincerely interested in the phillosophy and implementation of SP'GB's "right to be forgotten" if there is such a policy can I read more about it's philosphy and implementation here?

    No. Nothing that fancy as 'Right to be forgotten' anyway.Just (little understood)  functions and consquences of the CMS software the Mod was helpfully cautioning the poster about.

    in reply to: Marx and Automation #128720

    admin
    Participant
    moderator1 wrote:
    MBellemare wrote:
    Dear Moderator1…please delete my SPGB account and anything tied to this account…ASAP! Consider this a formal request for account deletion.  

    In order to have your account deleted you need to formally approach the Admin who will deal with your request.  However, I need to inform and warn you that by taking this drastic action all your past posts then appear has 'Anonymous' on the forum.  Which effectively deprives you of ownership of those posts should you wish to mention them or refer to them in any publication or on any other social medium/platform as the author.

     I sent him a private message as 'admin' asking if he wished me to do so in light of some moderator advice to him on the Forum."Hi Micheal . Do you still wish your account deleted in light of the moderator's comments to you about your postings etc."He didn't reply.I have now deleted this account permanently.

    in reply to: Server outage #133003

    admin
    Participant

    I keep almost writing it as such.

    in reply to: Originator of a THESIS on money’s incapacity #130075

    admin
    Participant
    Marcos wrote:
    1) I am limiting my post to one every month starting today. I don't want to over post
    Bijou Drains wrote:
    From my point of view I enjoy your posts and I think the idea that you might over post makes no sense to me. I woudl prefer to regularly read your posts as they are really good at putting the Socialist case. More power to your elbow!

    Me too.

    in reply to: The Party’s Twitter account! #132949

    admin
    Participant
    moderator1 wrote:
    james19 wrote:
    Thank you Admin….see

    Admin please repost your last post which I inadvertedly deleted when deleting the repeated posts by James19.

    Thanks. I edited an added the bit James was trying to post earlier. It came in my inbox, but not on the Forum for some reason.

    in reply to: The Party’s Twitter account! #132948

    admin
    Participant
    in reply to: Quora responses #131144

    admin
    Participant

    It is confusing . When you click onto your own name, or a participant, then it should provide a link to posts they have made, which is shareable such as ,Ian Raehttps://www.quora.com/profile/Ian-Rae-8https://www.quora.com/profile/Matthew-CulbertBrian Johnsonhttps://www.quora.com/profile/Brian-Johnson-429but the stats link is personal links only as far as I can see.I have only had 2,000 views this week and 7,000 for the month.I do get some interesting converations as well as 'smart ass' comments.

    in reply to: The Party’s Twitter account! #132944

    admin
    Participant
    in reply to: Decayed Wedding #132884

    admin
    Participant

    Ok. No problem. It might only be an admin function.

    in reply to: Decayed Wedding #132882

    admin
    Participant

    Go easy with these images and reduce the sizes please.i have done it for you this time.(Right clicking on them give you a menu which you can use to scale them)

    in reply to: Marx, le coup de jeune #132867

    admin
    Participant

    It is worth a try, to submit and be rejected.

    in reply to: SPINTCOM Files Error? #132836

    admin
    Participant
    gnome wrote:
    robert.cox wrote:
    SPINTCOM Files Error?Is there a problem with SPINTCOM today?  I can't get the files folder to open.

    Seems so.  Suggest you contact the Internet Committee.

    We can't do anything about it except wait on Yahoo fixing the error, which arises from their bloated data transfering scripts. It is just on spintcom. Spopen opens the files menu OK.It happened quite recently and then was sorted. Becoming a nuisance now frankly.

    in reply to: Originator of a THESIS on money’s incapacity #130012

    admin
    Participant
    Prakash RP wrote:
    Hi Adam, what's the matter with you ? You seem to have been silent for an eternity. I wish you would break silence soon and oblige me by articulating your stance on my view of the contradiction existing between the idea of the classless communist order and the principle of ' From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs '.

    Adam has already indicated he has no wish ot continue the corresponence with you any further. Stop hectoring him . 

    Prakash RP wrote:
    Almost all of the debaters against me in this thread hold my view wrong. I, however, don't expect you to be on my side. I'd just like you to clarify your stance on the following points. What follows is an excerpt from CAPITAL Volume I ( chapter XVII, section IV, subsection 2 ).

     ..and they have explained why.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 198 total)